DigitalOcean Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) vs. Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Same showdown, different day. Today I've spun up brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. All instances were spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in the New York area (or close to it). Without further ado, here's the results.
Overview
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked
Sun, 31 May 2026 03:00:52 GMT
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:00:55 GMT
Linux Distro
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version
6.8.0-71-generic
6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version
8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version
7.0.15
7.0.15
Location
New York, NY
Newark, NJ
Monthly Price
$21.00
$18.00
RAM (GB)
2
2
CPU Cores
2
2
Storage (TB)
60
80
Storage Type
NVMe
NVMe
Transfer (TB)
3
3
CPU
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor
AuthenticAMD
GenuineIntel
Model Name
DO-Premium-AMD
Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
Clock Speed (MHz)
1,996.25
3,791.98
CPU Cache Size (KB)
512.00
16,384.00
BogoMips
3,992.50
7,583.95
Events per Second
1,599.39
1,552.05
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.59
0.62
Average Latency (ms)
0.62
0.64
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.82
4.61
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.67
0.69
Memory
Memory Read
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second
5,207,157.62
7,875,668.83
Mebibytes per second
5,085.11
7,691.08
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.2
0.12
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
Memory Write
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second
5,245,096.07
7,729,812.11
Mebibytes per second
5,122.16
7,548.64
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.13
0.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
File I/O
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second
1,715.61
4,671.85
Writes per Second
1,143.67
3,114.56
Fsyncs per Second
3,669.98
9,976.90
Read Mebibytes per Second
26.81
73.00
Written Mebibytes per Second
17.87
48.67
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.15
0.06
Maximum Latency (ms)
16.22
2.76
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.54
0.17
Mutex
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms)
556.73
543.27
Average Latency (ms)
825.56
554.74
Maximum Latency (ms)
865.15
563.70
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
861.95
559.50
MySQL
MySQL Read-only
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
6,259.00
10,621.00
Queries per second
62,590.00
106,210.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.31
0.86
Average Latency (ms)
1.6
0.94
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.28
2.5
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.96
1.03
MySQL Write-only
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
3,970.00
10,229.00
Queries per second
39,700.00
102,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.36
0.64
Average Latency (ms)
2.52
0.98
Maximum Latency (ms)
11.04
2.08
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
3.55
1.23
MySQL Read/Write
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
2,013.00
5,072.00
Queries per second
20,130.00
50,720.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
3.03
1.59
Average Latency (ms)
4.96
1.97
Maximum Latency (ms)
24.99
3.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
6.91
2.39
MySQL INSERT
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
5,675.00
16,038.00
Queries per second
56,750.00
160,380.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.96
0.38
Average Latency (ms)
1.76
0.62
Maximum Latency (ms)
12.44
13.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.91
0.8
MySQL Bulk INSERT
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
1,463,217.00
2,424,342.00
Queries per second
14,632,170.00
24,243,420.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.01
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
443.24
205.81
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
MySQL SELECT
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
125,762.00
241,313.00
Queries per second
1,257,620.00
2,413,130.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.05
0.03
Average Latency (ms)
0.08
0.04
Maximum Latency (ms)
1.37
0.76
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.11
0.05
MySQL SELECT (Random Points)
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
7,556.00
12,080.00
Queries per second
75,560.00
120,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.51
0.21
Average Latency (ms)
1.32
0.83
Maximum Latency (ms)
6.33
3.31
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.79
1.04
MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
6,802.00
10,527.00
Queries per second
68,020.00
105,270.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.57
0.16
Average Latency (ms)
1.47
0.95
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.15
3.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.96
1.23
MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
5,367.00
17,123.00
Queries per second
53,670.00
171,230.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.96
0.38
Average Latency (ms)
1.86
0.58
Maximum Latency (ms)
13.89
2
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.71
0.78
MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
5,465.00
16,979.00
Queries per second
54,650.00
169,790.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.97
0.38
Average Latency (ms)
1.83
0.59
Maximum Latency (ms)
15.94
4.13
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.76
0.8
MySQL DELETE
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
59,025.00
156,424.00
Queries per second
590,250.00
1,564,240.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.03
Average Latency (ms)
0.17
0.06
Maximum Latency (ms)
9.29
4.87
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.3
0.07
Redis
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second
52,631.58
88,652.48
PING_MBULK per Second
54,436.58
89,605.73
SET per Second
54,112.55
90,171.33
GET per Second
55,370.98
90,579.71
INCR per Second
54,141.85
90,744.10
LPUSH per Second
53,908.36
90,497.73
RPUSH per Second
53,792.36
90,415.91
LPOP per Second
52,938.06
90,909.09
RPOP per Second
54,141.85
90,661.83
SADD per Second
53,248.14
90,252.70
HSET per Second
53,908.36
90,415.91
SPOP per Second
52,521.01
89,928.05
ZADD per Second
53,850.30
90,415.91
ZPOPMIN per Second
54,259.36
90,009.01
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second
39,093.04
66,533.60
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second
24,962.56
36,179.45
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second
18,402.65
26,239.83
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second
15,748.03
22,547.91
MSET (10 keys) per Second
68,212.83
88,105.73
Redis Average Latency (ms)
DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE
0.51
0.30
PING_MBULK
0.48
0.29
SET
0.48
0.29
GET
0.47
0.29
INCR
0.48
0.28
LPUSH
0.48
0.29
RPUSH
0.48
0.29
LPOP
0.49
0.28
RPOP
0.48
0.28
SADD
0.49
0.29
HSET
0.48
0.29
SPOP
0.49
0.29
ZADD
0.48
0.29
ZPOPMIN
0.48
0.29
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)
0.68
0.39
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)
1.08
0.71
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)
1.45
0.97
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)
1.82
1.14
MSET (10 keys)
0.39
0.30
Conclusion
From the friendly robots:
When comparing the benchmark performance between the DigitalOcean Premium AMD instance and the Vultr High Frequency Intel instance, the Vultr instance generally exhibits higher overall performance, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks and Redis operations, where it shows significantly higher request rates per second and lower latencies across various benchmarks. The Intel processor's higher clock speed and slightly better cache sizes contribute to its superior performance in CPU and memory operations. However, the DigitalOcean instance performs well in file I/O and memory operations, with notably lower latencies and higher throughput in file read and write operations. The Vultr instance might be more suitable for applications that benefit from high CPU performance and lower latency in memory operations, while the DigitalOcean instance could be advantageous for workloads that are more I/O heavy or require lower latencies in file and memory operations.
From the friendly human:
If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.