DigitalOcean Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB)

vs.

Same showdown, different day. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran some benchmarks. Each instance was running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Without further ado, here's the results.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Last Benchmarked Sun, 31 May 2026 20:00:52 GMT Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $56.00 $12.00
RAM (GB) 8 2
CPU Cores 4 1
Storage (TB) 160 50
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 5 3

CPU

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Vendor AuthenticAMD AuthenticAMD
Model Name DO-Premium-AMD AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 1,996.25 2,900.00
CPU Cache Size (KB) 512.00 1,024.00
BogoMips 3,992.50 5,799.99
Events per Second 1,535.42 4,576.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.59 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 0.65 0.22
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.89 3.32
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.69 0.23

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Operations per second 4,867,578.39 7,453,499.54
Mebibytes per second 4,753.49 7,278.81
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.19 0.58
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Operations per second 4,347,879.44 7,526,142.42
Mebibytes per second 4,245.98 7,349.75
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.56 0.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Reads per Second 2,384.51 4,488.85
Writes per Second 1,589.67 2,992.54
Fsyncs per Second 5,095.64 9,582.19
Read Mebibytes per Second 37.26 70.14
Written Mebibytes per Second 24.84 46.76
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.11 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 9.42 2.5
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.58 0.18

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 325.10 1,235.70
Average Latency (ms) 435.66 1,245.09
Maximum Latency (ms) 487.90 1,250.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 484.44 1,258.08

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 5,392.00 12,923.00
Queries per second 53,920.00 129,230.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.37 0.71
Average Latency (ms) 1.85 0.77
Maximum Latency (ms) 3 2.96
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.35 0.87

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,296.00 10,029.00
Queries per second 32,960.00 100,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.47 0.66
Average Latency (ms) 3.03 1
Maximum Latency (ms) 19.45 2.69
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 4.41 1.37

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,930.00 5,077.00
Queries per second 19,300.00 50,770.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 3.41 1.58
Average Latency (ms) 5.18 1.97
Maximum Latency (ms) 26.77 5.64
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 6.55 2.39

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 4,756.00 16,678.00
Queries per second 47,560.00 166,780.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.08 0.41
Average Latency (ms) 2.1 0.6
Maximum Latency (ms) 40.66 11.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.25 0.74

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,434,092.00 2,453,467.00
Queries per second 14,340,920.00 24,534,670.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 418.16 225.38
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 125,686.00 352,826.00
Queries per second 1,256,860.00 3,528,260.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.05 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.08 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.84 1.28
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.11 0.04

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 7,055.00 14,624.00
Queries per second 70,550.00 146,240.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.33 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 1.42 0.68
Maximum Latency (ms) 7.12 3.17
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.07 0.89

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 6,592.00 14,460.00
Queries per second 65,920.00 144,600.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.19
Average Latency (ms) 1.52 0.69
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.28 2.46
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.03 0.89

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 5,138.00 15,256.00
Queries per second 51,380.00 152,560.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.07 0.42
Average Latency (ms) 1.94 0.65
Maximum Latency (ms) 39.78 2.4
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.81 0.99

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 4,781.00 15,643.00
Queries per second 47,810.00 156,430.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.13 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 2.09 0.64
Maximum Latency (ms) 19.23 2.48
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.07 0.89

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 41,513.00 209,105.00
Queries per second 415,130.00 2,091,050.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.05 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.24 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.7 2.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.67 0.08

Redis

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 62,073.25 42,607.59
PING_MBULK per Second 58,719.91 42,936.88
SET per Second 54,171.18 42,808.22
GET per Second 64,308.68 42,771.60
INCR per Second 55,648.30 42,955.32
LPUSH per Second 55,493.89 42,698.55
RPUSH per Second 52,938.06 42,535.09
LPOP per Second 62,539.09 42,087.54
RPOP per Second 66,269.05 37,551.63
SADD per Second 62,189.05 41,823.50
HSET per Second 55,157.20 42,408.82
SPOP per Second 54,674.69 43,177.89
ZADD per Second 55,035.77 42,265.43
ZPOPMIN per Second 55,035.77 43,122.04
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 37,355.25 32,916.39
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 21,715.53 21,367.52
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 16,084.93 16,228.50
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,990.26 14,363.69
MSET (10 keys) per Second 57,770.08 40,650.41

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Premium AMD (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
PING_INLINE0.420.78
PING_MBULK0.440.78
SET0.480.78
GET0.400.78
INCR0.470.78
LPUSH0.470.79
RPUSH0.490.79
LPOP0.420.79
RPOP0.390.92
SADD0.420.79
HSET0.470.79
SPOP0.470.77
ZADD0.480.79
ZPOPMIN0.470.78
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.781.01
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.261.54
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)1.712.07
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)1.912.34
MSET (10 keys)0.470.84

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

After careful analysis of the provided benchmarks, it's clear that the DigitalOcean Premium AMD instance (8 GB, 4 Cores) outperforms the Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB) in most metrics. The DigitalOcean instance delivers higher rates in Redis operations, CPU performance, file I/O, memory operations, and MySQL performance, indicating its superiority in handling CPU-intensive, I/O-heavy workloads, and memory-intensive tasks. The Vultr instance, though having a slightly faster single-core CPU, falls short in multi-core and overall performance metrics, making it less ideal for demanding applications requiring extensive RAM or multiple CPU cores. Therefore, for scenarios demanding high throughput, low latency, and heavy resource utilization, the DigitalOcean instance would be more suitable. Conversely, if the application primarily uses a single core and requires lower resource allocation, the more affordable Vultr instance could be adequate.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.