DigitalOcean Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) vs. DigitalOcean Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)

vs.

My friend, I'm so glad you're here! Today I've spun up brand new instance from DigitalOcean and did some benchmarking. Each instance was spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in the New York area (or close to it). Enough talk. Here's the data.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Tue, 02 Jun 2026 10:00:52 GMT Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-71-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY New York, NY
Monthly Price $32.00 $64.00
RAM (GB) 4 8
CPU Cores 2 4
Storage (TB) 120 240
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 4 6

CPU

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Vendor GenuineIntel GenuineIntel
Model Name DO-Premium-Intel DO-Premium-Intel
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,494.14 1,995.31
CPU Cache Size (KB) 4,096.00 4,096.00
BogoMips 4,988.28 3,990.61
Events per Second 1,013.24 2,100.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.91 0.46
Average Latency (ms) 0.99 0.48
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.46 0.77
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.18 0.49

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Operations per second 4,737,587.61 4,031,036.30
Mebibytes per second 4,626.55 3,936.56
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.19 0.09
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Operations per second 4,690,301.22 4,327,248.72
Mebibytes per second 4,580.37 4,225.83
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.13 0.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Reads per Second 3,904.49 1,848.36
Writes per Second 2,603.00 1,232.24
Fsyncs per Second 8,340.46 3,943.27
Read Mebibytes per Second 61.01 28.88
Written Mebibytes per Second 40.67 19.25
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.07 0.14
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.68 32.73
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.23 0.83

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 945.06 496.91
Average Latency (ms) 960.64 678.09
Maximum Latency (ms) 978.40 755.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 977.74 759.88

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 6,729.00 5,172.00
Queries per second 67,290.00 51,720.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.1 1.28
Average Latency (ms) 1.48 1.93
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.66 8.32
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.03 2.61

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 6,393.00 2,301.00
Queries per second 63,930.00 23,010.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.87 1.35
Average Latency (ms) 1.56 4.34
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.8 12.64
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.22 7.3

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,171.00 1,495.00
Queries per second 31,710.00 14,950.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.04 2.89
Average Latency (ms) 3.15 6.68
Maximum Latency (ms) 16.44 19.01
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 4.18 10.46

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 10,914.00 3,010.00
Queries per second 109,140.00 30,100.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.47 1.11
Average Latency (ms) 0.91 3.32
Maximum Latency (ms) 17.13 14.62
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.42 6.09

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 1,346,717.00 1,201,092.00
Queries per second 13,467,170.00 12,010,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0.01
Maximum Latency (ms) 325.43 566.03
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 186,816.00 157,927.00
Queries per second 1,868,160.00 1,579,270.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.03 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.96 2.99
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.07 0.09

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 6,818.00 5,434.00
Queries per second 68,180.00 54,340.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.51 0.45
Average Latency (ms) 1.46 1.84
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.34 14.81
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.96 2.71

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 7,024.00 6,582.00
Queries per second 70,240.00 65,820.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.52 0.57
Average Latency (ms) 1.42 1.52
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.69 5.15
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.93 2.66

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 10,358.00 3,033.00
Queries per second 103,580.00 30,330.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.48 1
Average Latency (ms) 0.96 3.29
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.5 67.75
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.47 5.99

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 11,283.00 3,268.00
Queries per second 112,830.00 32,680.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 1.03
Average Latency (ms) 0.88 3.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 10.44 11.49
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.34 5.57

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 108,489.00 24,924.00
Queries per second 1,084,890.00 249,240.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.09 0.4
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.68 26.64
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.12 2.81

Redis

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 92,250.92 93,545.37
PING_MBULK per Second 93,370.68 87,796.30
SET per Second 88,731.15 93,457.94
GET per Second 94,339.62 94,250.71
INCR per Second 91,491.30 85,106.38
LPUSH per Second 86,132.64 95,057.03
RPUSH per Second 95,602.30 86,505.19
LPOP per Second 73,964.50 89,285.71
RPOP per Second 82,781.46 100,100.10
SADD per Second 79,428.12 90,661.83
HSET per Second 95,147.48 90,415.91
SPOP per Second 82,236.84 96,432.02
ZADD per Second 91,743.12 97,751.71
ZPOPMIN per Second 79,491.26 97,751.71
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 51,786.64 58,997.05
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 23,158.87 26,191.72
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 16,113.44 15,961.69
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,839.00 14,390.56
MSET (10 keys) per Second 92,936.80 73,152.89

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.320.28
PING_MBULK0.310.31
SET0.320.31
GET0.330.28
INCR0.320.31
LPUSH0.300.29
RPUSH0.280.32
LPOP0.350.32
RPOP0.320.27
SADD0.330.32
HSET0.320.29
SPOP0.370.30
ZADD0.290.31
ZPOPMIN0.350.28
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.630.46
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.331.05
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)1.812.04
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)1.982.12
MSET (10 keys)0.380.49

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

Comparing the benchmark performance of DigitalOcean's Premium Intel instances, the 4 GB, 2 Cores model shows impressive results with high request per second rates and relatively low latencies for Redis operations, CPU events, and file I/O, especially excelling in memory read and write operations with minimal latencies. The 8 GB, 4 Cores model, while slightly slower in some specific metrics, provides superior overall performance across the board with higher request rates and lower latencies in most Redis commands, CPU events, and better file I/O and memory throughput. It's ideal for workloads that benefit from multiple CPU cores and more RAM, such as high-concurrency applications or those requiring heavy computation or I/O operations, whereas the smaller instance is better suited for moderately loaded applications or those prioritizing cost-efficiency with strong single-threaded performance.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for DigitalOcean.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.