DigitalOcean Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB)

vs.

Fresh benchmarks coming at ya. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. All instances were spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Without further ado, here's the results.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Last Benchmarked Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:00:52 GMT Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $64.00 $12.00
RAM (GB) 8 2
CPU Cores 4 1
Storage (TB) 240 50
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 6 3

CPU

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Vendor GenuineIntel AuthenticAMD
Model Name DO-Premium-Intel AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 1,995.31 2,900.00
CPU Cache Size (KB) 4,096.00 1,024.00
BogoMips 3,990.61 5,799.99
Events per Second 2,100.00 4,576.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 0.48 0.22
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.77 3.32
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.49 0.23

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Operations per second 4,031,036.30 7,453,499.54
Mebibytes per second 3,936.56 7,278.81
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.09 0.58
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Operations per second 4,327,248.72 7,526,142.42
Mebibytes per second 4,225.83 7,349.75
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.18 0.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Reads per Second 1,848.36 4,488.85
Writes per Second 1,232.24 2,992.54
Fsyncs per Second 3,943.27 9,582.19
Read Mebibytes per Second 28.88 70.14
Written Mebibytes per Second 19.25 46.76
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.14 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 32.73 2.5
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.83 0.18

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 496.91 1,235.70
Average Latency (ms) 678.09 1,245.09
Maximum Latency (ms) 755.25 1,250.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 759.88 1,258.08

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 5,172.00 12,923.00
Queries per second 51,720.00 129,230.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.28 0.71
Average Latency (ms) 1.93 0.77
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.32 2.96
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.61 0.87

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 2,301.00 10,029.00
Queries per second 23,010.00 100,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.35 0.66
Average Latency (ms) 4.34 1
Maximum Latency (ms) 12.64 2.69
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 7.3 1.37

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,495.00 5,077.00
Queries per second 14,950.00 50,770.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.89 1.58
Average Latency (ms) 6.68 1.97
Maximum Latency (ms) 19.01 5.64
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 10.46 2.39

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,010.00 16,678.00
Queries per second 30,100.00 166,780.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.11 0.41
Average Latency (ms) 3.32 0.6
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.62 11.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 6.09 0.74

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,201,092.00 2,453,467.00
Queries per second 12,010,920.00 24,534,670.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 566.03 225.38
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 157,927.00 352,826.00
Queries per second 1,579,270.00 3,528,260.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.99 1.28
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.09 0.04

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 5,434.00 14,624.00
Queries per second 54,340.00 146,240.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.45 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 1.84 0.68
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.81 3.17
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.71 0.89

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 6,582.00 14,460.00
Queries per second 65,820.00 144,600.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.57 0.19
Average Latency (ms) 1.52 0.69
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.15 2.46
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.66 0.89

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,033.00 15,256.00
Queries per second 30,330.00 152,560.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1 0.42
Average Latency (ms) 3.29 0.65
Maximum Latency (ms) 67.75 2.4
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.99 0.99

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,268.00 15,643.00
Queries per second 32,680.00 156,430.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.03 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 3.06 0.64
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.49 2.48
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.57 0.89

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second 24,924.00 209,105.00
Queries per second 249,240.00 2,091,050.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.4 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 26.64 2.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.81 0.08

Redis

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 93,545.37 42,607.59
PING_MBULK per Second 87,796.30 42,936.88
SET per Second 93,457.94 42,808.22
GET per Second 94,250.71 42,771.60
INCR per Second 85,106.38 42,955.32
LPUSH per Second 95,057.03 42,698.55
RPUSH per Second 86,505.19 42,535.09
LPOP per Second 89,285.71 42,087.54
RPOP per Second 100,100.10 37,551.63
SADD per Second 90,661.83 41,823.50
HSET per Second 90,415.91 42,408.82
SPOP per Second 96,432.02 43,177.89
ZADD per Second 97,751.71 42,265.43
ZPOPMIN per Second 97,751.71 43,122.04
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 58,997.05 32,916.39
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 26,191.72 21,367.52
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 15,961.69 16,228.50
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,390.56 14,363.69
MSET (10 keys) per Second 73,152.89 40,650.41

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
PING_INLINE0.280.78
PING_MBULK0.310.78
SET0.310.78
GET0.280.78
INCR0.310.78
LPUSH0.290.79
RPUSH0.320.79
LPOP0.320.79
RPOP0.270.92
SADD0.320.79
HSET0.290.79
SPOP0.300.77
ZADD0.310.79
ZPOPMIN0.280.78
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.461.01
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.051.54
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.042.07
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.122.34
MSET (10 keys)0.490.84

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

When comparing the two VPS instances, the DigitalOcean Premium Intel configuration shows superior performance in CPU-intensive and I/O-heavy workloads due to its higher core count, larger RAM, and higher benchmark results in Redis, MySQL, and file I/O operations. The Vultr High Performance AMD instance, while showing respectable performance, is ultimately outpaced in most metrics, especially in tasks requiring higher concurrency and throughput such as Redis LRANGE operations and MySQL bulk insert operations. The DigitalOcean instance is ideal for workloads that benefit from higher CPU cores, such as complex calculations, high-concurrency database operations, or large-scale data processing, whereas the Vultr instance is more suitable for simpler, less demanding tasks and lower concurrency environments.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.