DigitalOcean Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)

vs.

Same showdown, different day. Today I've spun up brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Enough talk. Here's the data.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:00:52 GMT Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $64.00 $24.00
RAM (GB) 8 4
CPU Cores 4 2
Storage (TB) 240 100
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 6 5

CPU

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor GenuineIntel AuthenticAMD
Model Name DO-Premium-Intel AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 1,995.31 2,900.00
CPU Cache Size (KB) 4,096.00 1,024.00
BogoMips 3,990.61 5,800.00
Events per Second 2,100.00 4,640.69
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 0.48 0.22
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.77 2.06
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.49 0.22

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 4,031,036.30 7,477,512.86
Mebibytes per second 3,936.56 7,302.26
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.09 1.14
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 4,327,248.72 7,470,053.68
Mebibytes per second 4,225.83 7,294.97
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.18 0.58
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second 1,848.36 7,520.15
Writes per Second 1,232.24 5,013.44
Fsyncs per Second 3,943.27 16,053.19
Read Mebibytes per Second 28.88 117.50
Written Mebibytes per Second 19.25 78.33
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.14 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 32.73 2.8
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.83 0.11

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 496.91 636.97
Average Latency (ms) 678.09 656.50
Maximum Latency (ms) 755.25 673.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 759.88 669.89

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 5,172.00 9,956.00
Queries per second 51,720.00 99,560.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.28 0.72
Average Latency (ms) 1.93 1
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.32 3.1
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.61 1.1

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 2,301.00 9,961.00
Queries per second 23,010.00 99,610.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.35 0.68
Average Latency (ms) 4.34 1
Maximum Latency (ms) 12.64 11.2
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 7.3 1.3

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 1,495.00 4,604.00
Queries per second 14,950.00 46,040.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.89 1.75
Average Latency (ms) 6.68 2.17
Maximum Latency (ms) 19.01 5.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 10.46 2.57

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,010.00 15,661.00
Queries per second 30,100.00 156,610.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.11 0.44
Average Latency (ms) 3.32 0.64
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.62 12.49
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 6.09 0.78

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 1,201,092.00 2,948,592.00
Queries per second 12,010,920.00 29,485,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 566.03 209.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 157,927.00 219,418.00
Queries per second 1,579,270.00 2,194,180.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.99 3.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.09 0.06

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 5,434.00 14,794.00
Queries per second 54,340.00 147,940.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.45 0.25
Average Latency (ms) 1.84 0.68
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.81 6.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.71 0.87

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 6,582.00 14,380.00
Queries per second 65,820.00 143,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.57 0.25
Average Latency (ms) 1.52 0.69
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.15 1.69
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.66 0.9

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,033.00 14,781.00
Queries per second 30,330.00 147,810.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1 0.45
Average Latency (ms) 3.29 0.68
Maximum Latency (ms) 67.75 2.23
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.99 0.9

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,268.00 15,048.00
Queries per second 32,680.00 150,480.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.03 0.46
Average Latency (ms) 3.06 0.66
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.49 3.7
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.57 0.84

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 24,924.00 156,902.00
Queries per second 249,240.00 1,569,020.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.4 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 26.64 7.04
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.81 0.08

Redis

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 93,545.37 61,500.61
PING_MBULK per Second 87,796.30 57,770.08
SET per Second 93,457.94 57,803.47
GET per Second 94,250.71 58,275.06
INCR per Second 85,106.38 58,343.06
LPUSH per Second 95,057.03 57,803.47
RPUSH per Second 86,505.19 58,275.06
LPOP per Second 89,285.71 58,377.11
RPOP per Second 100,100.10 58,275.06
SADD per Second 90,661.83 57,903.88
HSET per Second 90,415.91 57,670.13
SPOP per Second 96,432.02 57,273.77
ZADD per Second 97,751.71 58,719.91
ZPOPMIN per Second 97,751.71 57,504.31
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 58,997.05 50,000.00
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 26,191.72 33,489.62
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 15,961.69 26,130.13
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,390.56 24,467.83
MSET (10 keys) per Second 73,152.89 57,240.98

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.280.43
PING_MBULK0.310.45
SET0.310.45
GET0.280.44
INCR0.310.44
LPUSH0.290.45
RPUSH0.320.44
LPOP0.320.44
RPOP0.270.44
SADD0.320.45
HSET0.290.45
SPOP0.300.45
ZADD0.310.44
ZPOPMIN0.280.45
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.460.52
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.050.77
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.040.99
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.121.04
MSET (10 keys)0.490.45

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

Upon analyzing the benchmarks for both DigitalOcean's Premium Intel instance and Vultr's High Performance AMD instance, it's evident that DigitalOcean's instance excels in raw performance, offering higher throughput and lower latency across various metrics such as CPU operations, Redis benchmarks, file I/O, and memory operations, primarily due to its higher core count and advanced Intel architecture. Conversely, Vultr's AMD instance, while competitive, particularly shines in specific high-throughput scenarios but generally falls behind in latency and throughput across most metrics, suggesting it may be more suitable for cost-sensitive applications where maximum performance isn't the primary concern. DigitalOcean's instance is ideal for CPU-intensive and I/O-heavy workloads, while Vultr's might be more appropriate for scenarios requiring lower costs over slightly reduced performance.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.