DigitalOcean Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance Intel (1 GB)

vs.

Fresh benchmarks coming at ya. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and did some benchmarking. All instances were spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in the New York area (or close to it). Without further ado, here's the results.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Last Benchmarked Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:00:52 GMT Sat, 30 May 2026 16:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $64.00 $6.00
RAM (GB) 8 1
CPU Cores 4 1
Storage (TB) 240 25
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 6 2

CPU

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Vendor GenuineIntel GenuineIntel
Model Name DO-Premium-Intel Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
Clock Speed (MHz) 1,995.31 2,893.17
CPU Cache Size (KB) 4,096.00 16,384.00
BogoMips 3,990.61 5,786.33
Events per Second 2,100.00 1,117.86
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.83
Average Latency (ms) 0.48 0.89
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.77 3.92
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.49 1.04

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Operations per second 4,031,036.30 4,957,996.46
Mebibytes per second 3,936.56 4,841.79
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.09 0.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Operations per second 4,327,248.72 4,994,957.56
Mebibytes per second 4,225.83 4,877.89
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.18 0.96
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Reads per Second 1,848.36 4,047.78
Writes per Second 1,232.24 2,698.52
Fsyncs per Second 3,943.27 8,646.86
Read Mebibytes per Second 28.88 63.25
Written Mebibytes per Second 19.25 42.16
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.14 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 32.73 3.35
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.83 0.19

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 496.91 1,571.60
Average Latency (ms) 678.09 1,588.95
Maximum Latency (ms) 755.25 1,599.96
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 759.88 1,589.90

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 5,172.00 8,137.00
Queries per second 51,720.00 81,370.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.28 1.08
Average Latency (ms) 1.93 1.23
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.32 6.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.61 1.42

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 2,301.00 7,462.00
Queries per second 23,010.00 74,620.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.35 0.77
Average Latency (ms) 4.34 1.34
Maximum Latency (ms) 12.64 5.26
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 7.3 1.93

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 1,495.00 3,070.00
Queries per second 14,950.00 30,700.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.89 2.45
Average Latency (ms) 6.68 3.25
Maximum Latency (ms) 19.01 8.6
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 10.46 4.18

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 3,010.00 15,069.00
Queries per second 30,100.00 150,690.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.11 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 3.32 0.66
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.62 3.39
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 6.09 0.87

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 1,201,092.00 964,103.00
Queries per second 12,010,920.00 9,641,030.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0.01
Maximum Latency (ms) 566.03 458.6
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 157,927.00 213,306.00
Queries per second 1,579,270.00 2,133,060.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.99 4.3
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.09 0.07

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 5,434.00 5,672.00
Queries per second 54,340.00 56,720.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.45 0.58
Average Latency (ms) 1.84 1.76
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.81 8.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.71 2.52

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 6,582.00 7,910.00
Queries per second 65,820.00 79,100.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.57 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 1.52 1.26
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.15 3.43
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.66 1.67

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 3,033.00 13,874.00
Queries per second 30,330.00 138,740.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 3.29 0.72
Maximum Latency (ms) 67.75 10.49
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.99 1.08

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 3,268.00 15,344.00
Queries per second 32,680.00 153,440.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.03 0.42
Average Latency (ms) 3.06 0.65
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.49 4.43
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.57 0.86

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
Transactions per second 24,924.00 83,214.00
Queries per second 249,240.00 832,140.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.05
Average Latency (ms) 0.4 0.12
Maximum Latency (ms) 26.64 4.88
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.81 0.31

Redis

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 93,545.37 45,998.16
PING_MBULK per Second 87,796.30 46,210.72
SET per Second 93,457.94 48,756.70
GET per Second 94,250.71 47,014.57
INCR per Second 85,106.38 46,707.14
LPUSH per Second 95,057.03 46,296.29
RPUSH per Second 86,505.19 45,248.87
LPOP per Second 89,285.71 47,551.12
RPOP per Second 100,100.10 47,573.74
SADD per Second 90,661.83 46,794.57
HSET per Second 90,415.91 42,662.11
SPOP per Second 96,432.02 46,794.57
ZADD per Second 97,751.71 45,433.89
ZPOPMIN per Second 97,751.71 46,296.29
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 58,997.05 24,260.07
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 26,191.72 14,120.31
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 15,961.69 9,612.61
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,390.56 8,560.91
MSET (10 keys) per Second 73,152.89 43,859.65

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB)
PING_INLINE0.280.71
PING_MBULK0.310.70
SET0.310.68
GET0.280.70
INCR0.310.71
LPUSH0.290.72
RPUSH0.320.73
LPOP0.320.70
RPOP0.270.70
SADD0.320.70
HSET0.290.76
SPOP0.300.70
ZADD0.310.72
ZPOPMIN0.280.70
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.461.42
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.052.51
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.043.69
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.124.14
MSET (10 keys)0.490.78

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

Based on the benchmark results, the DigitalOcean instance demonstrates superior performance in terms of raw computational power, memory handling, and overall throughput compared to the Vultr instance. DigitalOcean excels in handling CPU-intensive tasks, with more CPU cores and higher benchmarked rates in various operations across Redis, MySQL, and general CPU tasks. It also outperforms in file I/O operations and memory management, suggesting it is better suited for applications requiring high I/O performance and multitasking capabilities. Conversely, the Vultr instance, while still capable, is geared more towards cost-sensitive, simpler applications where a single CPU core suffices. For developers and sysadmins seeking high-performance computing capabilities, especially in data-intensive workloads, the DigitalOcean instance is the more appropriate choice. However, for lighter workloads and when budget constraints are a priority, the Vultr instance provides adequate performance at a lower cost.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.