DigitalOcean Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance Intel (2 GB)

vs.

Welcome to another round of the VPS Showdown. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. All instances were spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in the New York area (or close to it). Enough talk. Here's the data.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Last Benchmarked Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:00:52 GMT Mon, 01 Jun 2026 07:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $64.00 $12.00
RAM (GB) 8 2
CPU Cores 4 1
Storage (TB) 240 50
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 6 3

CPU

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Vendor GenuineIntel GenuineIntel
Model Name DO-Premium-Intel Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
Clock Speed (MHz) 1,995.31 2,893.17
CPU Cache Size (KB) 4,096.00 16,384.00
BogoMips 3,990.61 5,786.33
Events per Second 2,100.00 1,048.47
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.83
Average Latency (ms) 0.48 0.95
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.77 5.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.49 1.21

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Operations per second 4,031,036.30 4,854,174.96
Mebibytes per second 3,936.56 4,740.41
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.09 2.23
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Operations per second 4,327,248.72 4,942,528.76
Mebibytes per second 4,225.83 4,826.69
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.18 4.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Reads per Second 1,848.36 4,132.87
Writes per Second 1,232.24 2,755.21
Fsyncs per Second 3,943.27 8,825.96
Read Mebibytes per Second 28.88 64.58
Written Mebibytes per Second 19.25 43.05
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.14 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 32.73 2.15
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.83 0.19

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 496.91 1,776.90
Average Latency (ms) 678.09 1,797.61
Maximum Latency (ms) 755.25 1,811.62
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 759.88 1,803.47

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 5,172.00 7,971.00
Queries per second 51,720.00 79,710.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.28 1.06
Average Latency (ms) 1.93 1.25
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.32 4.3
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.61 1.58

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 2,301.00 7,352.00
Queries per second 23,010.00 73,520.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.35 0.83
Average Latency (ms) 4.34 1.36
Maximum Latency (ms) 12.64 4.44
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 7.3 2

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,495.00 3,189.00
Queries per second 14,950.00 31,890.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.89 2.31
Average Latency (ms) 6.68 3.13
Maximum Latency (ms) 19.01 15.9
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 10.46 4.18

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,010.00 13,921.00
Queries per second 30,100.00 139,210.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.11 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 3.32 0.71
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.62 3.82
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 6.09 0.97

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,201,092.00 1,230,217.00
Queries per second 12,010,920.00 12,302,170.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0.01
Maximum Latency (ms) 566.03 357.55
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 157,927.00 207,049.00
Queries per second 1,579,270.00 2,070,490.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.99 2.95
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.09 0.07

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 5,434.00 6,025.00
Queries per second 54,340.00 60,250.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.45 0.49
Average Latency (ms) 1.84 1.66
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.81 4.45
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.71 2.35

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 6,582.00 7,229.00
Queries per second 65,820.00 72,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.57 0.53
Average Latency (ms) 1.52 1.38
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.15 5.38
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.66 1.96

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,033.00 12,590.00
Queries per second 30,330.00 125,900.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1 0.44
Average Latency (ms) 3.29 0.79
Maximum Latency (ms) 67.75 6.03
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.99 1.23

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,268.00 13,129.00
Queries per second 32,680.00 131,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.03 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 3.06 0.76
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.49 3.97
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 5.57 1.08

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 24,924.00 111,517.00
Queries per second 249,240.00 1,115,170.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.4 0.09
Maximum Latency (ms) 26.64 10.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.81 0.18

Redis

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 93,545.37 43,252.59
PING_MBULK per Second 87,796.30 43,917.44
SET per Second 93,457.94 44,189.13
GET per Second 94,250.71 45,228.40
INCR per Second 85,106.38 44,662.79
LPUSH per Second 95,057.03 42,936.88
RPUSH per Second 86,505.19 42,955.32
LPOP per Second 89,285.71 39,339.10
RPOP per Second 100,100.10 43,572.98
SADD per Second 90,661.83 43,878.89
HSET per Second 90,415.91 43,010.75
SPOP per Second 96,432.02 43,497.17
ZADD per Second 97,751.71 42,034.47
ZPOPMIN per Second 97,751.71 44,052.86
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 58,997.05 25,893.32
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 26,191.72 13,837.00
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 15,961.69 8,880.99
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,390.56 8,015.39
MSET (10 keys) per Second 73,152.89 38,865.14

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
PING_INLINE0.280.75
PING_MBULK0.310.75
SET0.310.75
GET0.280.73
INCR0.310.73
LPUSH0.290.76
RPUSH0.320.77
LPOP0.320.86
RPOP0.270.76
SADD0.320.74
HSET0.290.76
SPOP0.300.75
ZADD0.310.78
ZPOPMIN0.280.74
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.461.30
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.052.56
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.043.99
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.124.43
MSET (10 keys)0.490.87

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

After analyzing the benchmark results for both the DigitalOcean Premium Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) and the Vultr High Performance Intel (2 GB), it is clear that the DigitalOcean instance outperforms the Vultr instance in terms of overall computational power and throughput, especially evident in Redis benchmarks where the DigitalOcean instance consistently shows higher RPS (requests per second) and lower latency metrics. DigitalOcean's instance also excels in memory operations and file I/O, which points to better overall performance for memory-intensive and I/O-heavy workloads. However, the Vultr instance, while showing lower performance in most areas, has competitive file I/O metrics and is notably more cost-effective. Ideal use cases for DigitalOcean's instance would be for CPU-intensive, memory-demanding, or high-throughput applications, whereas the Vultr instance might be more suitable for applications requiring a balance of moderate performance and lower costs.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.