DigitalOcean Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) vs. Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)

vs.

Fresh benchmarks coming at ya. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Without further ado, here's the results.

Overview

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Sun, 31 May 2026 08:00:52 GMT Sun, 31 May 2026 13:00:55 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-71-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location New York, NY Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $18.00 $18.00
RAM (GB) 2 2
CPU Cores 2 2
Storage (TB) 60 80
Storage Type SSD NVMe
Transfer (TB) 3 3

CPU

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor GenuineIntel GenuineIntel
Model Name DO-Regular Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,494.14 3,791.98
CPU Cache Size (KB) 4,096.00 16,384.00
BogoMips 4,988.28 7,583.95
Events per Second 813.64 1,552.05
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.91 0.62
Average Latency (ms) 1.23 0.64
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.88 4.61
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.44 0.69

Memory

Memory Read

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 3,863,161.54 7,875,668.83
Mebibytes per second 3,772.62 7,691.08
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.47 0.12
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 3,937,174.33 7,729,812.11
Mebibytes per second 3,844.90 7,548.64
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.03 0.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second 1,604.65 4,671.85
Writes per Second 1,069.77 3,114.56
Fsyncs per Second 3,429.94 9,976.90
Read Mebibytes per Second 25.07 73.00
Written Mebibytes per Second 16.72 48.67
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.16 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 9.88 2.76
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.4 0.17

Mutex

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 1,275.46 543.27
Average Latency (ms) 1,454.38 554.74
Maximum Latency (ms) 1,488.79 563.70
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1,479.41 559.50

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 1,594.00 10,621.00
Queries per second 15,940.00 106,210.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.68 0.86
Average Latency (ms) 6.27 0.94
Maximum Latency (ms) 87.36 2.5
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 24.38 1.03

MySQL Write-only

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 1,576.00 10,229.00
Queries per second 15,760.00 102,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2 0.64
Average Latency (ms) 6.34 0.98
Maximum Latency (ms) 34.54 2.08
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 14.46 1.23

MySQL Read/Write

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 582.00 5,072.00
Queries per second 5,820.00 50,720.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 3.92 1.59
Average Latency (ms) 17.17 1.97
Maximum Latency (ms) 125.99 3.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 47.47 2.39

MySQL INSERT

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 2,759.00 16,038.00
Queries per second 27,590.00 160,380.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.36 0.38
Average Latency (ms) 3.62 0.62
Maximum Latency (ms) 34.11 13.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 7.04 0.8

MySQL Bulk INSERT

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 964,103.00 2,424,342.00
Queries per second 9,641,030.00 24,243,420.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 459.02 205.81
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 54,163.00 241,313.00
Queries per second 541,630.00 2,413,130.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.03
Average Latency (ms) 0.18 0.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 23.62 0.76
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.43 0.05

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,859.00 12,080.00
Queries per second 38,590.00 120,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.61 0.21
Average Latency (ms) 2.59 0.83
Maximum Latency (ms) 53.87 3.31
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 6.55 1.04

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 7,179.00 10,527.00
Queries per second 71,790.00 105,270.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.38 0.16
Average Latency (ms) 1.39 0.95
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.44 3.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.86 1.23

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 2,435.00 17,123.00
Queries per second 24,350.00 171,230.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.15 0.38
Average Latency (ms) 4.1 0.58
Maximum Latency (ms) 52.68 2
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 8.9 0.78

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 2,495.00 16,979.00
Queries per second 24,950.00 169,790.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.37 0.38
Average Latency (ms) 4 0.59
Maximum Latency (ms) 40.4 4.13
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 8.9 0.8

MySQL DELETE

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 13,719.00 156,424.00
Queries per second 137,190.00 1,564,240.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.03
Average Latency (ms) 0.73 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 38.65 4.87
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.25 0.07

Redis

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 78,740.16 88,652.48
PING_MBULK per Second 77,821.02 89,605.73
SET per Second 75,815.01 90,171.33
GET per Second 75,414.78 90,579.71
INCR per Second 76,628.36 90,744.10
LPUSH per Second 76,511.09 90,497.73
RPUSH per Second 79,617.83 90,415.91
LPOP per Second 79,808.46 90,909.09
RPOP per Second 74,074.07 90,661.83
SADD per Second 77,101.00 90,252.70
HSET per Second 74,294.21 90,415.91
SPOP per Second 72,358.90 89,928.05
ZADD per Second 78,616.35 90,415.91
ZPOPMIN per Second 73,800.73 90,009.01
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 53,705.69 66,533.60
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 27,218.29 36,179.45
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 18,573.55 26,239.83
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 16,578.25 22,547.91
MSET (10 keys) per Second 73,206.44 88,105.73

Redis Average Latency (ms)

DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.330.30
PING_MBULK0.330.29
SET0.350.29
GET0.340.29
INCR0.410.28
LPUSH0.340.29
RPUSH0.330.29
LPOP0.330.28
RPOP0.350.28
SADD0.340.29
HSET0.350.29
SPOP0.360.29
ZADD0.330.29
ZPOPMIN0.350.29
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.520.39
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.130.71
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)1.470.97
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)1.621.14
MSET (10 keys)0.360.30

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

In benchmarking both instances, the Vultr High Frequency Intel server outperforms the DigitalOcean Regular instance in terms of raw processing power, as evidenced by the higher requests per second (rps) across various Redis commands, notably achieving up to 90,000+ rps compared to DigitalOcean's 78,000+ rps, which highlights a more capable CPU performance, especially in compute-heavy tasks. The Vultr instance also demonstrates superior file I/O throughput and lower latencies across the board, suggesting it might be better for I/O-intensive workloads. However, DigitalOcean's instance shows consistent performance and lower latency in more complex Redis operations like LRANGE, hinting at its reliability in such tasks. Given these results, Vultr is ideal for CPU-intensive applications requiring high throughput and low latencies, while DigitalOcean's instance could be more suited for balanced workloads where complex data processing is needed alongside reliable performance.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.