Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
New day, new benchmarks. Today I've spun up brand new instance from Vultr and did some benchmarking. All instances were running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Without further ado, here's the results.
Overview
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:00:55 GMT
Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version
6.8.0-117-generic
6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version
8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version
7.0.15
7.0.15
Location
Newark, NJ
Newark, NJ
Monthly Price
$18.00
$24.00
RAM (GB)
2
4
CPU Cores
2
2
Storage (TB)
80
100
Storage Type
NVMe
NVMe
Transfer (TB)
3
5
CPU
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor
GenuineIntel
AuthenticAMD
Model Name
Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz)
3,791.98
2,900.00
CPU Cache Size (KB)
16,384.00
1,024.00
BogoMips
7,583.95
5,800.00
Events per Second
1,552.05
4,640.69
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.62
0.2
Average Latency (ms)
0.64
0.22
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.61
2.06
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.69
0.22
Memory
Memory Read
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second
7,875,668.83
7,477,512.86
Mebibytes per second
7,691.08
7,302.26
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.12
1.14
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
Memory Write
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second
7,729,812.11
7,470,053.68
Mebibytes per second
7,548.64
7,294.97
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.16
0.58
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
File I/O
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second
4,671.85
7,520.15
Writes per Second
3,114.56
5,013.44
Fsyncs per Second
9,976.90
16,053.19
Read Mebibytes per Second
73.00
117.50
Written Mebibytes per Second
48.67
78.33
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.06
0.03
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.76
2.8
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.17
0.11
Mutex
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms)
543.27
636.97
Average Latency (ms)
554.74
656.50
Maximum Latency (ms)
563.70
673.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
559.50
669.89
MySQL
MySQL Read-only
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
10,621.00
9,956.00
Queries per second
106,210.00
99,560.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.86
0.72
Average Latency (ms)
0.94
1
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.5
3.1
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.03
1.1
MySQL Write-only
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
10,229.00
9,961.00
Queries per second
102,290.00
99,610.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.64
0.68
Average Latency (ms)
0.98
1
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.08
11.2
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.23
1.3
MySQL Read/Write
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
5,072.00
4,604.00
Queries per second
50,720.00
46,040.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.59
1.75
Average Latency (ms)
1.97
2.17
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.94
5.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.39
2.57
MySQL INSERT
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
16,038.00
15,661.00
Queries per second
160,380.00
156,610.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.38
0.44
Average Latency (ms)
0.62
0.64
Maximum Latency (ms)
13.18
12.49
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.8
0.78
MySQL Bulk INSERT
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
2,424,342.00
2,948,592.00
Queries per second
24,243,420.00
29,485,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
205.81
209.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
MySQL SELECT
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
241,313.00
219,418.00
Queries per second
2,413,130.00
2,194,180.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.03
0.02
Average Latency (ms)
0.04
0.05
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.76
3.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.05
0.06
MySQL SELECT (Random Points)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
12,080.00
14,794.00
Queries per second
120,800.00
147,940.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.21
0.25
Average Latency (ms)
0.83
0.68
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.31
6.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.04
0.87
MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
10,527.00
14,380.00
Queries per second
105,270.00
143,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.16
0.25
Average Latency (ms)
0.95
0.69
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.25
1.69
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.23
0.9
MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
17,123.00
14,781.00
Queries per second
171,230.00
147,810.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.38
0.45
Average Latency (ms)
0.58
0.68
Maximum Latency (ms)
2
2.23
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.78
0.9
MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
16,979.00
15,048.00
Queries per second
169,790.00
150,480.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.38
0.46
Average Latency (ms)
0.59
0.66
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.13
3.7
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.8
0.84
MySQL DELETE
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
156,424.00
156,902.00
Queries per second
1,564,240.00
1,569,020.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.03
0.02
Average Latency (ms)
0.06
0.06
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.87
7.04
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.07
0.08
Redis
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second
88,652.48
61,500.61
PING_MBULK per Second
89,605.73
57,770.08
SET per Second
90,171.33
57,803.47
GET per Second
90,579.71
58,275.06
INCR per Second
90,744.10
58,343.06
LPUSH per Second
90,497.73
57,803.47
RPUSH per Second
90,415.91
58,275.06
LPOP per Second
90,909.09
58,377.11
RPOP per Second
90,661.83
58,275.06
SADD per Second
90,252.70
57,903.88
HSET per Second
90,415.91
57,670.13
SPOP per Second
89,928.05
57,273.77
ZADD per Second
90,415.91
58,719.91
ZPOPMIN per Second
90,009.01
57,504.31
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second
66,533.60
50,000.00
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second
36,179.45
33,489.62
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second
26,239.83
26,130.13
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second
22,547.91
24,467.83
MSET (10 keys) per Second
88,105.73
57,240.98
Redis Average Latency (ms)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (4 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE
0.30
0.43
PING_MBULK
0.29
0.45
SET
0.29
0.45
GET
0.29
0.44
INCR
0.28
0.44
LPUSH
0.29
0.45
RPUSH
0.29
0.44
LPOP
0.28
0.44
RPOP
0.28
0.44
SADD
0.29
0.45
HSET
0.29
0.45
SPOP
0.29
0.45
ZADD
0.29
0.44
ZPOPMIN
0.29
0.45
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)
0.39
0.52
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)
0.71
0.77
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)
0.97
0.99
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)
1.14
1.04
MSET (10 keys)
0.30
0.45
Conclusion
From the friendly robots:
When comparing the Vultr High Frequency Intel instance and the Vultr High Performance AMD instance, both configurations show impressive performance, yet they differ in specific areas. The Intel instance excels in handling Redis commands with higher request rates per second (rps) and lower latency for most operations, though it lags slightly in longer list range operations. The AMD instance provides better overall CPU performance, with slightly higher events per second and lower average latencies, but it trails behind in raw Redis command execution rates and slightly higher latencies for some Redis operations. The AMD instance also outperforms in memory read operations with higher throughput. Both instances provide excellent file I/O performance, with low average latencies and high throughput. Ideal use cases for the Intel instance would be environments favoring higher Redis throughput, while the AMD instance would be better suited for workloads benefiting from higher overall CPU efficiency and better memory performance, making it ideal for CPU-intensive and memory-heavy applications.
From the friendly human:
If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for Vultr.