Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)

vs.

Same showdown, different day. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from Vultr and ran some benchmarks. Each instance was spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Enough talk. Here's the data.

Overview

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Sun, 31 May 2026 13:00:55 GMT Sun, 31 May 2026 03:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-117-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $18.00 $48.00
RAM (GB) 2 8
CPU Cores 2 4
Storage (TB) 80 180
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 3 6

CPU

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Vendor GenuineIntel GenuineIntel
Model Name Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX) Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
Clock Speed (MHz) 3,791.98 2,893.17
CPU Cache Size (KB) 16,384.00 16,384.00
BogoMips 7,583.95 5,786.33
Events per Second 1,552.05 1,164.11
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.62 0.83
Average Latency (ms) 0.64 0.86
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.61 1.81
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.69 0.9

Memory

Memory Read

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Operations per second 7,875,668.83 5,268,671.27
Mebibytes per second 7,691.08 5,145.19
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.12 0.85
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Operations per second 7,729,812.11 5,300,398.23
Mebibytes per second 7,548.64 5,176.17
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.16 0.29
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Reads per Second 4,671.85 8,120.73
Writes per Second 3,114.56 5,413.82
Fsyncs per Second 9,976.90 17,334.39
Read Mebibytes per Second 73.00 126.89
Written Mebibytes per Second 48.67 84.59
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.76 16.4
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.17 0.1

Mutex

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 543.27 197.88
Average Latency (ms) 554.74 357.16
Maximum Latency (ms) 563.70 411.19
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 559.50 411.96

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 10,621.00 7,388.00
Queries per second 106,210.00 73,880.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.86 1.14
Average Latency (ms) 0.94 1.35
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.5 3.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.03 1.7

MySQL Write-only

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 10,229.00 7,997.00
Queries per second 102,290.00 79,970.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.64 0.87
Average Latency (ms) 0.98 1.25
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.08 3.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.23 1.55

MySQL Read/Write

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 5,072.00 3,262.00
Queries per second 50,720.00 32,620.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.59 2.17
Average Latency (ms) 1.97 3.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.94 7.36
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.39 3.82

MySQL INSERT

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 16,038.00 12,898.00
Queries per second 160,380.00 128,980.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.38 0.44
Average Latency (ms) 0.62 0.77
Maximum Latency (ms) 13.18 11.56
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.8 1.04

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 2,424,342.00 1,434,092.00
Queries per second 24,243,420.00 14,340,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0.01
Maximum Latency (ms) 205.81 363.55
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 241,313.00 190,206.00
Queries per second 2,413,130.00 1,902,060.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.03 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.04 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.76 2
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.05 0.07

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 12,080.00 6,349.00
Queries per second 120,800.00 63,490.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.21 0.37
Average Latency (ms) 0.83 1.57
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.31 3.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.04 2.11

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 10,527.00 7,578.00
Queries per second 105,270.00 75,780.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.16 0.33
Average Latency (ms) 0.95 1.32
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.25 3.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.23 1.79

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 17,123.00 12,520.00
Queries per second 171,230.00 125,200.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.38 0.44
Average Latency (ms) 0.58 0.8
Maximum Latency (ms) 2 3.4
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.78 1.06

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 16,979.00 13,084.00
Queries per second 169,790.00 130,840.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.38 0.45
Average Latency (ms) 0.59 0.76
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.13 4.55
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.8 0.99

MySQL DELETE

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
Transactions per second 156,424.00 116,263.00
Queries per second 1,564,240.00 1,162,630.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.03 0.03
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.09
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.87 3.79
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.07 0.12

Redis

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 88,652.48 53,022.27
PING_MBULK per Second 89,605.73 58,139.54
SET per Second 90,171.33 58,309.04
GET per Second 90,579.71 59,453.03
INCR per Second 90,744.10 60,024.01
LPUSH per Second 90,497.73 58,997.05
RPUSH per Second 90,415.91 59,916.12
LPOP per Second 90,909.09 60,938.45
RPOP per Second 90,661.83 61,804.70
SADD per Second 90,252.70 62,189.05
HSET per Second 90,415.91 63,131.31
SPOP per Second 89,928.05 61,274.51
ZADD per Second 90,415.91 61,312.08
ZPOPMIN per Second 90,009.01 63,653.72
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 66,533.60 42,535.09
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 36,179.45 25,018.76
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 26,239.83 17,895.49
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 22,547.91 15,649.45
MSET (10 keys) per Second 88,105.73 61,199.51

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.300.49
PING_MBULK0.290.44
SET0.290.44
GET0.290.43
INCR0.280.43
LPUSH0.290.44
RPUSH0.290.43
LPOP0.280.43
RPOP0.280.42
SADD0.290.47
HSET0.290.45
SPOP0.290.42
ZADD0.290.43
ZPOPMIN0.290.45
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.390.87
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)0.711.46
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)0.971.69
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)1.141.77
MSET (10 keys)0.300.45

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

Upon analyzing the benchmark performance, the High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) instance from Vultr shows excellent performance in Redis operations with high request rates per second (rps) and low latency across various commands, along with good CPU and file I/O performance, making it suitable for memory-intensive and low-latency applications. Conversely, the High Performance Intel (8 GB, 4 Cores) instance demonstrates superior overall performance across the board, with higher rps rates, lower latencies, and more robust CPU, memory, and I/O operations, making it ideal for CPU-intensive, I/O-heavy, and large-scale applications requiring substantial computational and data throughput capabilities. The choice between these instances will depend on the specific needs of your workload, with the former being a strong choice for less demanding tasks and the latter excelling in more resource-intensive scenarios.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.