Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB) vs. Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
New day, new benchmarks. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from Vultr and did some benchmarking. Each instance was spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Let's get into the numbers.
Overview
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked
Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:00:52 GMT
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:00:55 GMT
Linux Distro
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version
6.8.0-117-generic
6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version
8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version
7.0.15
7.0.15
Location
Newark, NJ
Newark, NJ
Monthly Price
$12.00
$18.00
RAM (GB)
2
2
CPU Cores
1
2
Storage (TB)
64
80
Storage Type
NVMe
NVMe
Transfer (TB)
2
3
CPU
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor
GenuineIntel
GenuineIntel
Model Name
Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
Clock Speed (MHz)
3,791.94
3,791.98
CPU Cache Size (KB)
16,384.00
16,384.00
BogoMips
7,583.88
7,583.95
Events per Second
1,614.29
1,552.05
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.6
0.62
Average Latency (ms)
0.62
0.64
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.64
4.61
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.65
0.69
Memory
Memory Read
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second
7,985,914.58
7,875,668.83
Mebibytes per second
7,798.74
7,691.08
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.24
0.12
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
Memory Write
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second
7,978,494.69
7,729,812.11
Mebibytes per second
7,791.50
7,548.64
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.18
0.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
File I/O
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second
4,908.89
4,671.85
Writes per Second
3,272.56
3,114.56
Fsyncs per Second
10,477.62
9,976.90
Read Mebibytes per Second
76.70
73.00
Written Mebibytes per Second
51.13
48.67
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.05
0.06
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.03
2.76
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.17
0.17
Mutex
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms)
1,069.98
543.27
Average Latency (ms)
1,074.62
554.74
Maximum Latency (ms)
1,079.74
563.70
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1,089.30
559.50
MySQL
MySQL Read-only
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
10,721.00
10,621.00
Queries per second
107,210.00
106,210.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.88
0.86
Average Latency (ms)
0.93
0.94
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.02
2.5
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.99
1.03
MySQL Write-only
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
10,441.00
10,229.00
Queries per second
104,410.00
102,290.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.66
0.64
Average Latency (ms)
0.96
0.98
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.34
2.08
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.21
1.23
MySQL Read/Write
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
4,696.00
5,072.00
Queries per second
46,960.00
50,720.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.77
1.59
Average Latency (ms)
2.13
1.97
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.93
3.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.39
2.39
MySQL INSERT
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
16,763.00
16,038.00
Queries per second
167,630.00
160,380.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.37
0.38
Average Latency (ms)
0.6
0.62
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.1
13.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.77
0.8
MySQL Bulk INSERT
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
2,163,851.00
2,424,342.00
Queries per second
21,638,510.00
24,243,420.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
339.49
205.81
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
MySQL SELECT
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
241,217.00
241,313.00
Queries per second
2,412,170.00
2,413,130.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.03
Average Latency (ms)
0.04
0.04
Maximum Latency (ms)
1.64
0.76
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.05
0.05
MySQL SELECT (Random Points)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
11,395.00
12,080.00
Queries per second
113,950.00
120,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.38
0.21
Average Latency (ms)
0.88
0.83
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.85
3.31
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.12
1.04
MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
11,233.00
10,527.00
Queries per second
112,330.00
105,270.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.26
0.16
Average Latency (ms)
0.89
0.95
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.45
3.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.14
1.23
MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
16,456.00
17,123.00
Queries per second
164,560.00
171,230.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.39
0.38
Average Latency (ms)
0.61
0.58
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.08
2
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.84
0.78
MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
17,511.00
16,979.00
Queries per second
175,110.00
169,790.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.38
0.38
Average Latency (ms)
0.57
0.59
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.23
4.13
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.73
0.8
MySQL DELETE
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second
155,994.00
156,424.00
Queries per second
1,559,940.00
1,564,240.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.03
Average Latency (ms)
0.06
0.06
Maximum Latency (ms)
1.33
4.87
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.09
0.07
Redis
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second
55,279.16
88,652.48
PING_MBULK per Second
56,053.81
89,605.73
SET per Second
55,187.64
90,171.33
GET per Second
55,772.45
90,579.71
INCR per Second
55,741.36
90,744.10
LPUSH per Second
55,340.34
90,497.73
RPUSH per Second
55,187.64
90,415.91
LPOP per Second
55,096.42
90,909.09
RPOP per Second
55,187.64
90,661.83
SADD per Second
55,218.11
90,252.70
HSET per Second
55,096.42
90,415.91
SPOP per Second
55,959.71
89,928.05
ZADD per Second
55,309.73
90,415.91
ZPOPMIN per Second
56,053.81
90,009.01
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second
37,835.79
66,533.60
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second
21,088.15
36,179.45
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second
14,148.27
26,239.83
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second
12,471.94
22,547.91
MSET (10 keys) per Second
51,894.13
88,105.73
Redis Average Latency (ms)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE
0.58
0.30
PING_MBULK
0.57
0.29
SET
0.59
0.29
GET
0.58
0.29
INCR
0.58
0.28
LPUSH
0.58
0.29
RPUSH
0.58
0.29
LPOP
0.59
0.28
RPOP
0.58
0.28
SADD
0.58
0.29
HSET
0.59
0.29
SPOP
0.58
0.29
ZADD
0.59
0.29
ZPOPMIN
0.57
0.29
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)
0.91
0.39
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)
1.65
0.71
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)
2.56
0.97
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)
2.89
1.14
MSET (10 keys)
0.66
0.30
Conclusion
From the friendly robots:
The Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 1 Core) instance demonstrates respectable Redis performance with high request rates and low latency for most operations, although it shows a bit more variability in latency for larger list range queries. The Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB, 2 Cores) instance shows significantly higher request rates and lower average latencies for Redis operations, indicating better performance due to the addition of a second CPU core. File I/O and memory performance are also comparable between the two instances, with slight edge to the 2-core version in throughput and slightly lower latency for mutex operations. The 2-core instance is better suited for CPU-intensive and multi-threaded workloads, while the 1-core version remains a good choice for single-threaded applications or when cost is a primary concern.
From the friendly human:
If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for Vultr.