Vultr High Performance Intel (1 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)

vs.

Same showdown, different day. Today I've spun up brand new instance from Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Let's get into the numbers.

Overview

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Sat, 30 May 2026 16:00:52 GMT Sun, 31 May 2026 07:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-117-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $6.00 $18.00
RAM (GB) 1 2
CPU Cores 1 2
Storage (TB) 25 60
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 2 4

CPU

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor GenuineIntel AuthenticAMD
Model Name Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake) AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,893.17 2,899.99
CPU Cache Size (KB) 16,384.00 1,024.00
BogoMips 5,786.33 5,799.98
Events per Second 1,117.86 4,648.14
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.83 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 0.89 0.21
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.92 1.26
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.04 0.23

Memory

Memory Read

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 4,957,996.46 7,548,502.85
Mebibytes per second 4,841.79 7,371.58
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.83 0.08
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 4,994,957.56 7,544,807.09
Mebibytes per second 4,877.89 7,367.98
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.96 0.12
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second 4,047.78 5,114.79
Writes per Second 2,698.52 3,409.86
Fsyncs per Second 8,646.86 10,914.44
Read Mebibytes per Second 63.25 79.92
Written Mebibytes per Second 42.16 53.28
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.35 3.7
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.19 0.12

Mutex

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 1,571.60 574.03
Average Latency (ms) 1,588.95 637.47
Maximum Latency (ms) 1,599.96 663.74
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1,589.90 657.93

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 8,137.00 9,622.00
Queries per second 81,370.00 96,220.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.08 0.73
Average Latency (ms) 1.23 1.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.86 2.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.42 1.12

MySQL Write-only

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 7,462.00 9,585.00
Queries per second 74,620.00 95,850.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.77 0.8
Average Latency (ms) 1.34 1.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.26 2.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.93 1.32

MySQL Read/Write

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,070.00 4,686.00
Queries per second 30,700.00 46,860.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.45 1.57
Average Latency (ms) 3.25 2.13
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.6 4.26
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 4.18 2.52

MySQL INSERT

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 15,069.00 15,965.00
Queries per second 150,690.00 159,650.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.45
Average Latency (ms) 0.66 0.62
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.39 2.23
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.87 0.74

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 964,103.00 3,065,092.00
Queries per second 9,641,030.00 30,650,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 458.6 208.51
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 213,306.00 217,035.00
Queries per second 2,133,060.00 2,170,350.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.3 0.61
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.07 0.06

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 5,672.00 14,818.00
Queries per second 56,720.00 148,180.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.58 0.24
Average Latency (ms) 1.76 0.67
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.16 1.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.52 0.86

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 7,910.00 14,341.00
Queries per second 79,100.00 143,410.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.27
Average Latency (ms) 1.26 0.7
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.43 1.67
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.67 0.89

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 13,874.00 14,864.00
Queries per second 138,740.00 148,640.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.47
Average Latency (ms) 0.72 0.67
Maximum Latency (ms) 10.49 2.36
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.08 0.87

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 15,344.00 15,284.00
Queries per second 153,440.00 152,840.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.42 0.46
Average Latency (ms) 0.65 0.65
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.43 1.65
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.86 0.83

MySQL DELETE

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 83,214.00 151,536.00
Queries per second 832,140.00 1,515,360.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.05 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.12 0.07
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.88 4.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.31 0.08

Redis

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 45,998.16 55,991.04
PING_MBULK per Second 46,210.72 57,903.88
SET per Second 48,756.70 57,703.40
GET per Second 47,014.57 57,703.40
INCR per Second 46,707.14 57,372.34
LPUSH per Second 46,296.29 57,836.90
RPUSH per Second 45,248.87 58,173.36
LPOP per Second 47,551.12 58,343.06
RPOP per Second 47,573.74 58,343.06
SADD per Second 46,794.57 58,241.12
HSET per Second 42,662.11 58,858.15
SPOP per Second 46,794.57 58,892.82
ZADD per Second 45,433.89 57,504.31
ZPOPMIN per Second 46,296.29 57,870.37
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 24,260.07 49,236.83
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 14,120.31 34,818.94
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 9,612.61 26,766.60
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 8,560.91 24,207.21
MSET (10 keys) per Second 43,859.65 58,548.01

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Vultr – High Performance Intel (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.710.48
PING_MBULK0.700.44
SET0.680.45
GET0.700.45
INCR0.710.45
LPUSH0.720.44
RPUSH0.730.44
LPOP0.700.44
RPOP0.700.44
SADD0.700.44
HSET0.760.44
SPOP0.700.44
ZADD0.720.45
ZPOPMIN0.700.44
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)1.420.53
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)2.510.74
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)3.690.95
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)4.141.05
MSET (10 keys)0.780.44

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

Analyzing the benchmark data for both Vultr instances reveals that the AMD-based High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) instance generally outperforms the Intel-based High Performance Intel (1 GB) in most metrics. The AMD instance achieves higher requests per second (rps) in Redis operations and better average latencies across various commands, indicating superior single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. The AMD instance also demonstrates higher file I/O throughput and better MySQL performance, with faster bulk inserts and OLTP operations. While both instances perform well, the AMD-based instance's superior metrics in CPU, memory, and I/O operations suggest it is better suited for CPU-intensive and I/O-heavy workloads, making it ideal for applications that benefit from multi-core processing and high data throughput, whereas the Intel-based instance, despite its lower cost, might be more appropriate for simpler, less demanding applications.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.