Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) vs. Vultr High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)

vs.

Same showdown, different day. Today I've spun up some brand new instance from Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was spun up with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Without further ado, here's the results.

Overview

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Sun, 31 May 2026 07:00:52 GMT Fri, 29 May 2026 08:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-117-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $18.00 $24.00
RAM (GB) 2 4
CPU Cores 2 2
Storage (TB) 60 100
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 4 5

CPU

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor AuthenticAMD GenuineIntel
Model Name AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,899.99 2,992.93
CPU Cache Size (KB) 1,024.00 16,384.00
BogoMips 5,799.98 5,985.85
Events per Second 4,648.14 1,189.71
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.2 0.81
Average Latency (ms) 0.21 0.84
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.26 1.55
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.23 0.92

Memory

Memory Read

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 7,548,502.85 5,388,530.93
Mebibytes per second 7,371.58 5,262.24
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.08 0.68
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 7,544,807.09 5,409,821.52
Mebibytes per second 7,367.98 5,283.03
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.12 1.24
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second 5,114.79 8,517.92
Writes per Second 3,409.86 5,678.61
Fsyncs per Second 10,914.44 18,177.32
Read Mebibytes per Second 79.92 133.09
Written Mebibytes per Second 53.28 88.73
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.7 3.66
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.12 0.1

Mutex

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 574.03 731.16
Average Latency (ms) 637.47 765.98
Maximum Latency (ms) 663.74 804.13
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 657.93 802.05

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 9,622.00 7,840.00
Queries per second 96,220.00 78,400.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.73 1.07
Average Latency (ms) 1.04 1.27
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.22 3.93
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.12 1.73

MySQL Write-only

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 9,585.00 9,079.00
Queries per second 95,850.00 90,790.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.8 0.73
Average Latency (ms) 1.04 1.1
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.18 3.41
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.32 1.44

MySQL Read/Write

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 4,686.00 4,084.00
Queries per second 46,860.00 40,840.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.57 1.98
Average Latency (ms) 2.13 2.45
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.26 6.6
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.52 3.13

MySQL INSERT

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 15,965.00 16,065.00
Queries per second 159,650.00 160,650.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.45 0.4
Average Latency (ms) 0.62 0.62
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.23 2.84
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.74 0.84

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 3,065,092.00 1,608,842.00
Queries per second 30,650,920.00 16,088,420.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0.01
Maximum Latency (ms) 208.51 296.58
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 217,035.00 199,828.00
Queries per second 2,170,350.00 1,998,280.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.02 0.03
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.61 3.21
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.06 0.07

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 14,818.00 7,759.00
Queries per second 148,180.00 77,590.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.24 0.34
Average Latency (ms) 0.67 1.29
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.94 3.41
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.86 1.7

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 14,341.00 8,104.00
Queries per second 143,410.00 81,040.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.27 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 0.7 1.23
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.67 2.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.89 1.64

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 14,864.00 16,223.00
Queries per second 148,640.00 162,230.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.47 0.4
Average Latency (ms) 0.67 0.62
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.36 8.91
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.87 0.86

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 15,284.00 17,156.00
Queries per second 152,840.00 171,560.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.39
Average Latency (ms) 0.65 0.58
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.65 2.17
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.83 0.77

MySQL DELETE

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 151,536.00 146,778.00
Queries per second 1,515,360.00 1,467,780.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.02 0.03
Average Latency (ms) 0.07 0.07
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.83 3.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.08 0.09

Redis

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 55,991.04 67,069.08
PING_MBULK per Second 57,903.88 68,212.83
SET per Second 57,703.40 68,634.18
GET per Second 57,703.40 67,476.38
INCR per Second 57,372.34 67,704.80
LPUSH per Second 57,836.90 66,844.91
RPUSH per Second 58,173.36 69,541.03
LPOP per Second 58,343.06 68,870.52
RPOP per Second 58,343.06 67,888.66
SADD per Second 58,241.12 69,108.50
HSET per Second 58,858.15 68,917.99
SPOP per Second 58,892.82 68,027.21
ZADD per Second 57,504.31 68,681.32
ZPOPMIN per Second 57,870.37 67,796.61
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 49,236.83 51,361.07
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 34,818.94 27,382.26
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 26,766.60 19,157.09
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 24,207.21 17,301.04
MSET (10 keys) per Second 58,548.01 69,541.03

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) Vultr – High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.480.39
PING_MBULK0.440.38
SET0.450.38
GET0.450.38
INCR0.450.38
LPUSH0.440.39
RPUSH0.440.37
LPOP0.440.38
RPOP0.440.38
SADD0.440.37
HSET0.440.38
SPOP0.440.38
ZADD0.450.38
ZPOPMIN0.440.38
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.530.51
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)0.741.01
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)0.951.45
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)1.051.53
MSET (10 keys)0.440.38

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

Both instances showcase strong performance in various benchmarks, but the Vultr High Performance Intel (4 GB, 2 Cores) instance generally outperforms the Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) in terms of metrics such as Redis throughput, CPU performance, and file I/O operations. The Intel variant excels in Redis commands like LRANGE with lower latencies and higher request per second rates, as well as in CPU event processing and file I/O operations, reflecting a more substantial throughput and lower average latencies. However, the AMD instance offers competitive performance in memory operations and mutex execution, alongside a lower monthly cost. Ideal use cases for the Intel instance would be CPU-intensive, high-throughput applications, while the AMD instance may be more suited for scenarios requiring balanced performance with a focus on cost-efficiency and adequate memory and I/O operations.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.