Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)

vs.

My friend, I'm so glad you're here! Today I've spun up brand new instance from Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Without further ado, here's the results.

Overview

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Last Benchmarked Fri, 29 May 2026 13:00:53 GMT Sun, 31 May 2026 07:00:52 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 6.8.0-117-generic 6.8.0-117-generic
MySQL Version 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 8.0.45-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
Redis Version 7.0.15 7.0.15
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $12.00 $18.00
RAM (GB) 2 2
CPU Cores 1 2
Storage (TB) 50 60
Storage Type NVMe NVMe
Transfer (TB) 3 4

CPU

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Vendor AuthenticAMD AuthenticAMD
Model Name AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,900.00 2,899.99
CPU Cache Size (KB) 1,024.00 1,024.00
BogoMips 5,800.00 5,799.98
Events per Second 4,571.75 4,648.14
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.21 0.2
Average Latency (ms) 0.22 0.21
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.35 1.26
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.23 0.23

Memory

Memory Read

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 7,459,554.27 7,548,502.85
Mebibytes per second 7,284.72 7,371.58
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.58 0.08
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Operations per second 7,475,561.40 7,544,807.09
Mebibytes per second 7,300.35 7,367.98
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.27 0.12
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Reads per Second 5,083.40 5,114.79
Writes per Second 3,388.87 3,409.86
Fsyncs per Second 10,846.93 10,914.44
Read Mebibytes per Second 79.43 79.92
Written Mebibytes per Second 52.95 53.28
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.54 3.7
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.12 0.12

Mutex

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Minimum Latency (ms) 1,261.44 574.03
Average Latency (ms) 1,266.47 637.47
Maximum Latency (ms) 1,274.11 663.74
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1,280.93 657.93

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 12,567.00 9,622.00
Queries per second 125,670.00 96,220.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.71 0.73
Average Latency (ms) 0.79 1.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.08 2.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.94 1.12

MySQL Write-only

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 10,288.00 9,585.00
Queries per second 102,880.00 95,850.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.65 0.8
Average Latency (ms) 0.97 1.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.2 2.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.34 1.32

MySQL Read/Write

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 4,897.00 4,686.00
Queries per second 48,970.00 46,860.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.61 1.57
Average Latency (ms) 2.04 2.13
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.14 4.26
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.57 2.52

MySQL INSERT

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 16,170.00 15,965.00
Queries per second 161,700.00 159,650.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.45
Average Latency (ms) 0.62 0.62
Maximum Latency (ms) 18.34 2.23
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.74 0.74

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 2,408,418.00 3,065,092.00
Queries per second 24,084,180.00 30,650,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 221.46 208.51
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 326,079.00 217,035.00
Queries per second 3,260,790.00 2,170,350.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.03 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.03 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.17 0.61
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.04 0.06

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 14,308.00 14,818.00
Queries per second 143,080.00 148,180.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.16 0.24
Average Latency (ms) 0.7 0.67
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.35 1.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.89 0.86

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 14,222.00 14,341.00
Queries per second 142,220.00 143,410.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.26 0.27
Average Latency (ms) 0.7 0.7
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.04 1.67
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.9 0.89

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 15,111.00 14,864.00
Queries per second 151,110.00 148,640.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.47
Average Latency (ms) 0.66 0.67
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.73 2.36
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.01 0.87

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 15,910.00 15,284.00
Queries per second 159,100.00 152,840.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.42 0.46
Average Latency (ms) 0.63 0.65
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.9 1.65
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.9 0.83

MySQL DELETE

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
Transactions per second 194,308.00 151,536.00
Queries per second 1,943,080.00 1,515,360.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.02 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.07
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.02 4.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.08 0.08

Redis

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE per Second 40,273.86 55,991.04
PING_MBULK per Second 41,186.16 57,903.88
SET per Second 40,749.80 57,703.40
GET per Second 40,983.61 57,703.40
INCR per Second 40,866.37 57,372.34
LPUSH per Second 40,716.61 57,836.90
RPUSH per Second 40,766.41 58,173.36
LPOP per Second 40,966.82 58,343.06
RPOP per Second 35,536.61 58,343.06
SADD per Second 41,220.11 58,241.12
HSET per Second 40,453.08 58,858.15
SPOP per Second 41,649.31 58,892.82
ZADD per Second 41,631.97 57,504.31
ZPOPMIN per Second 41,963.91 57,870.37
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 32,701.11 49,236.83
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 21,114.87 34,818.94
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 15,974.44 26,766.60
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 14,202.53 24,207.21
MSET (10 keys) per Second 39,651.07 58,548.01

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores)
PING_INLINE0.820.48
PING_MBULK0.810.44
SET0.820.45
GET0.810.45
INCR0.810.45
LPUSH0.810.44
RPUSH0.810.44
LPOP0.820.44
RPOP0.950.44
SADD0.810.44
HSET0.830.44
SPOP0.800.44
ZADD0.800.45
ZPOPMIN0.790.44
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)1.010.53
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.550.74
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.080.95
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.331.05
MSET (10 keys)0.850.44

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

After analyzing the benchmark results, it's evident that the Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB, 2 Cores) instance outperforms the Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB) instance in several key metrics. The dual-core version demonstrates significantly higher performance in Redis benchmarks, notably achieving much higher requests per second (rps) across various commands like PING_INLINE, SET, GET, and LPUSH, which suggests it handles concurrent read/write operations more efficiently. CPU performance also favors the dual-core instance, showing better thread fairness and lower latency in CPU-bound tasks. File I/O and memory benchmarks similarly reflect this trend with faster read and write operations per second, and lower latency in memory operations. For developers and sysadmins, the dual-core instance is ideal for CPU-intensive and I/O-heavy workloads where higher concurrency and throughput are critical, such as high-traffic web servers, database servers, or applications requiring substantial parallel processing.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral link for Vultr.

You can also support me directly by buying me a coffee.