DigitalOcean Regular (2 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Same showdown, different day. Today I've got brand new instances from DigitalOcean and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was spun up with Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 and were created in the New York area (or close to it). Without further ado, here's the results.
Overview
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Last Benchmarked
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:03:47 GMT
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:12:02 GMT
Linux Distro
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version
7.0.0-27-generic
7.0.0-28-generic
MySQL Version
8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
Redis Version
8.0.5
8.0.5
Location
New York, NY
Newark, NJ
Monthly Price
$12.00
$12.00
RAM (GB)
2
2
CPU Cores
1
1
Storage (TB)
50
50
Storage Type
SSD
NVMe
Transfer (TB)
2
3
Head-to-head
Category winners from the latest benchmarks.
Category
Winner
CPU (events/sec)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Memory (read MiB/s)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Disk I/O (MiB/s)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
MySQL (read/write tps)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Redis (GET/sec)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Value (CPU events per $/mo)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB) takes 6 of 6 categories.
CPU
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Vendor
GenuineIntel
AuthenticAMD
Model Name
DO-Regular
AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz)
2,294.61
2,900.00
CPU Cache Size (KB)
4,096.00
1,024.00
BogoMips
4,589.21
5,800.00
Events per Second
337.24
4,289.74
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.07
0.22
Average Latency (ms)
2.96
0.23
Maximum Latency (ms)
7.98
3.69
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
4.74
0.25
Memory
Memory Read
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Operations per second
2,158,838.24
7,477,695.15
Mebibytes per second
2,108.24
7,302.44
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
7.22
0.24
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
Memory Write
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Operations per second
3,098,478.11
7,480,195.03
Mebibytes per second
3,025.86
7,304.88
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
2.23
0.26
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
File I/O
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Reads per Second
897.65
3,878.89
Writes per Second
598.43
2,585.89
Fsyncs per Second
1,924.36
8,276.45
Read Mebibytes per Second
14.03
60.61
Written Mebibytes per Second
9.35
40.40
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.29
0.07
Maximum Latency (ms)
30.6
2.04
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.9
0.19
Mutex
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms)
2,798.91
1,267.92
Average Latency (ms)
2,816.88
1,275.63
Maximum Latency (ms)
2,827.29
1,281.79
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2,828.87
1,280.93
MySQL
MySQL Read-only
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
4,209.00
14,172.00
Queries per second
42,090.00
141,720.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.24
0.64
Average Latency (ms)
2.37
0.7
Maximum Latency (ms)
5.8
3.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.91
0.78
MySQL Write-only
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
720.00
12,730.00
Queries per second
7,200.00
127,300.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
2.26
0.62
Average Latency (ms)
13.89
0.78
Maximum Latency (ms)
898.41
4.66
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
11.24
0.94
MySQL Read/Write
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
914.00
6,314.00
Queries per second
9,140.00
63,140.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
5.04
1.39
Average Latency (ms)
10.93
1.58
Maximum Latency (ms)
399.05
7.43
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
12.98
1.76
MySQL INSERT
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
2,481.00
20,594.00
Queries per second
24,810.00
205,940.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.76
0.39
Average Latency (ms)
4.02
0.48
Maximum Latency (ms)
209.08
3.1
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
6.43
0.57
MySQL Bulk INSERT
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
603,677.00
2,395,217.00
Queries per second
6,036,770.00
23,952,170.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.02
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
768.14
192.09
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
MySQL SELECT
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
111,711.00
364,617.00
Queries per second
1,117,110.00
3,646,170.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.02
Average Latency (ms)
0.09
0.03
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.67
0.91
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.14
0.04
MySQL SELECT (Random Points)
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
2,616.00
11,020.00
Queries per second
26,160.00
110,200.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.4
0.31
Average Latency (ms)
3.82
0.91
Maximum Latency (ms)
19.97
3.29
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
5.18
1.18
MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
2,567.00
14,569.00
Queries per second
25,670.00
145,690.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.01
0.22
Average Latency (ms)
3.89
0.69
Maximum Latency (ms)
8.69
2.01
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
5.57
0.89
MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
1,815.00
19,450.00
Queries per second
18,150.00
194,500.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.76
0.42
Average Latency (ms)
5.5
0.51
Maximum Latency (ms)
1034.92
10.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
6.67
0.61
MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
3,210.00
19,900.00
Queries per second
32,100.00
199,000.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.61
0.4
Average Latency (ms)
3.11
0.5
Maximum Latency (ms)
42.13
10.32
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
5.09
0.59
MySQL DELETE
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
Transactions per second
18,558.00
265,546.00
Queries per second
185,580.00
2,655,460.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.02
Average Latency (ms)
0.54
0.04
Maximum Latency (ms)
146.02
2.58
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
2.91
0.06
Redis
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second
32,310.18
48,146.37
PING_MBULK per Second
31,645.57
47,460.84
SET per Second
29,222.68
49,140.05
GET per Second
28,760.43
48,332.53
INCR per Second
34,411.56
47,080.98
LPUSH per Second
31,705.77
48,449.61
RPUSH per Second
30,883.26
47,961.63
LPOP per Second
30,892.80
46,794.57
RPOP per Second
33,602.15
47,103.16
SADD per Second
32,520.32
47,984.64
HSET per Second
34,459.00
47,961.63
SPOP per Second
35,997.12
46,838.41
ZADD per Second
29,197.08
48,947.62
ZPOPMIN per Second
29,403.12
47,619.05
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second
14,295.93
38,226.30
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second
6,915.15
24,906.60
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second
4,855.55
18,073.38
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second
4,463.09
16,404.20
MSET (10 keys) per Second
27,631.94
48,262.55
Redis Average Latency (ms)
DigitalOcean – Regular (2 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (2 GB)
PING_INLINE
0.96
0.63
PING_MBULK
0.97
0.63
SET
1.06
0.63
GET
1.08
0.62
INCR
0.91
0.65
LPUSH
0.98
0.64
RPUSH
0.99
0.65
LPOP
1.00
0.68
RPOP
0.94
0.66
SADD
0.95
0.64
HSET
0.91
0.65
SPOP
0.86
0.64
ZADD
1.07
0.64
ZPOPMIN
1.05
0.63
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)
2.23
0.82
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)
4.29
1.30
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)
5.91
1.69
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)
6.47
1.95
MSET (10 keys)
1.37
0.69
Conclusion
From the friendly robots:
The Vultr High Performance AMD instance outperforms the DigitalOcean Regular instance in nearly every benchmark, particularly in CPU processing with 4289.74 events per second compared to 337.24, and in Redis operations, where it handles significantly more requests per second with peak performance like 48947.62 RPS for ZADD. For use cases requiring high CPU and memory throughput, such as heavy computation tasks or high-traffic databases, Vultr's instance is clearly superior. Conversely, DigitalOcean's instance may be more suitable for less demanding, budget-conscious applications where moderate performance is sufficient.
From the friendly human:
If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for DigitalOcean and Vultr.