Linode Nanode (1 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance Intel (2 GB)

vs.

Fresh benchmarks coming at ya. Today I've got brand new instances from Linode and Vultr and did some benchmarking. All instances were running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Enough talk. Here's the data.

Overview

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Last Benchmarked Wed, 08 Jul 2026 02:29:06 GMT Wed, 08 Jul 2026 02:41:06 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 7.0.0-22-generic 7.0.0-27-generic
MySQL Version 8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1 8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
Redis Version 8.0.5 8.0.5
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $5.00 $12.00
RAM (GB) 1 2
CPU Cores 1 1
Storage (TB) 25 50
Storage Type SSD NVMe
Transfer (TB) 1 3

Head-to-head

Category winners from the latest benchmarks.

CategoryWinner
CPU (events/sec)Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Memory (read MiB/s)Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Disk I/O (MiB/s)Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
MySQL (read/write tps)Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Redis (GET/sec)Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Value (CPU events per $/mo)Linode – Nanode (1 GB)

Evenly matched across 6 categories.

CPU

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Vendor AuthenticAMD GenuineIntel
Model Name AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,000.00 2,893.17
CPU Cache Size (KB) 512.00 16,384.00
BogoMips 4,000.00 5,786.33
Events per Second 2,995.79 1,021.39
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.3 0.89
Average Latency (ms) 0.33 0.98
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.68 2.88
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.34 1.12

Memory

Memory Read

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Operations per second 5,138,712.44 4,986,398.08
Mebibytes per second 5,018.27 4,869.53
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.36 0.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Operations per second 5,126,038.83 5,001,584.28
Mebibytes per second 5,005.90 4,884.36
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.06 0.71
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Reads per Second 3,144.54 5,577.48
Writes per Second 2,096.29 3,718.32
Fsyncs per Second 6,714.53 11,911.32
Read Mebibytes per Second 49.13 87.15
Written Mebibytes per Second 32.75 58.10
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.08 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 40.23 5.29
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.19 0.15

Mutex

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 1,726.97 1,709.06
Average Latency (ms) 1,752.52 1,721.94
Maximum Latency (ms) 1,763.59 1,728.31
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1,771.29 1,739.68

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 7,323.00 7,873.00
Queries per second 73,230.00 78,730.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.26 1.05
Average Latency (ms) 1.36 1.27
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.63 3.75
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.58 1.55

MySQL Write-only

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 4,970.00 9,331.00
Queries per second 49,700.00 93,310.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.15 0.77
Average Latency (ms) 2.02 1.07
Maximum Latency (ms) 99.24 6.46
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.19 1.47

MySQL Read/Write

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 3,294.00 3,770.00
Queries per second 32,940.00 37,700.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.51 2.02
Average Latency (ms) 3.03 2.65
Maximum Latency (ms) 24.98 13.8
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.68 3.3

MySQL INSERT

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 11,632.00 16,828.00
Queries per second 116,320.00 168,280.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.65 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 0.86 0.59
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.61 3.44
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.14 0.78

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 1,201,092.00 1,201,092.00
Queries per second 12,010,920.00 12,010,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0.01
Maximum Latency (ms) 468.92 343.87
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 140,938.00 197,771.00
Queries per second 1,409,380.00 1,977,710.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.05 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.07 0.05
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.49 2.68
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.12 0.08

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 6,603.00 5,632.00
Queries per second 66,030.00 56,320.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.52 0.64
Average Latency (ms) 1.51 1.77
Maximum Latency (ms) 9.28 5.59
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.96 2.35

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 7,697.00 7,779.00
Queries per second 76,970.00 77,790.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.49 0.41
Average Latency (ms) 1.3 1.28
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.02 3.5
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.7 1.73

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 11,465.00 17,005.00
Queries per second 114,650.00 170,050.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.66 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 0.87 0.59
Maximum Latency (ms) 43.16 4.03
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.1 0.81

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 11,672.00 17,369.00
Queries per second 116,720.00 173,690.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.67 0.42
Average Latency (ms) 0.86 0.57
Maximum Latency (ms) 24.29 3.59
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.1 0.75

MySQL DELETE

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second 94,623.00 137,403.00
Queries per second 946,230.00 1,374,030.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.05 0.04
Average Latency (ms) 0.11 0.07
Maximum Latency (ms) 10.28 1.75
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.19 0.14

Redis

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 38,446.75 44,563.28
PING_MBULK per Second 38,505.97 44,014.08
SET per Second 39,123.63 44,782.80
GET per Second 38,804.81 43,440.48
INCR per Second 39,169.61 42,553.19
LPUSH per Second 39,215.69 44,702.73
RPUSH per Second 39,184.95 44,014.08
LPOP per Second 39,323.63 42,863.27
RPOP per Second 39,093.04 43,047.79
SADD per Second 38,008.36 44,345.89
HSET per Second 40,160.64 43,917.44
SPOP per Second 38,714.67 43,554.01
ZADD per Second 40,064.10 44,052.86
ZPOPMIN per Second 39,169.61 44,523.60
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 25,163.56 29,239.77
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 13,114.75 16,025.64
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 8,311.86 11,116.05
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 7,606.30 9,961.15
MSET (10 keys) per Second 37,821.48 40,783.04

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance Intel (2 GB)
PING_INLINE0.780.68
PING_MBULK0.780.67
SET0.790.68
GET0.770.69
INCR0.780.71
LPUSH0.790.68
RPUSH0.790.70
LPOP0.800.72
RPOP0.800.72
SADD0.810.69
HSET0.780.70
SPOP0.780.70
ZADD0.780.70
ZPOPMIN0.770.68
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)1.271.08
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)2.281.96
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)3.352.86
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)3.573.15
MSET (10 keys)0.860.80

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

The Vultr High Performance Intel instance outperforms the Linode Nanode in most benchmarks, notably in Redis operations with rates up to 44,563 RPS compared to Linode's 38,447 RPS, and in MySQL bulk inserts reaching 119,732 TPS versus Linode's 119,358 TPS. These significant differences make Vultr the clear winner for applications that demand high throughput and low latency, such as real-time data processing or high-frequency trading systems.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for Linode and Vultr.

You can also support me next time you shop on Amazon.

Related comparisons