Linode Nanode (1 GB) vs. Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Fresh benchmarks coming at ya. Today I've got brand new instances from Linode and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. Each instance was spun up with Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Let's get into the numbers.
Overview
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Last Benchmarked
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:01:32 GMT
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:09:02 GMT
Linux Distro
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version
7.0.0-22-generic
7.0.0-28-generic
MySQL Version
8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
Redis Version
8.0.5
8.0.5
Location
Newark, NJ
Newark, NJ
Monthly Price
$5.00
$12.00
RAM (GB)
1
2
CPU Cores
1
1
Storage (TB)
25
64
Storage Type
SSD
NVMe
Transfer (TB)
1
2
Head-to-head
Category winners from the latest benchmarks.
Category
Winner
CPU (events/sec)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Memory (read MiB/s)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Disk I/O (MiB/s)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
MySQL (read/write tps)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Redis (GET/sec)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Value (CPU events per $/mo)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Evenly matched across 6 categories.
CPU
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Vendor
AuthenticAMD
GenuineIntel
Model Name
AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor
Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
Clock Speed (MHz)
2,300.00
3,696.00
CPU Cache Size (KB)
512.00
16,384.00
BogoMips
4,600.00
7,391.99
Events per Second
1,479.09
1,429.28
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.65
0.67
Average Latency (ms)
0.68
0.7
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.07
3.93
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.69
0.8
Memory
Memory Read
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Operations per second
5,162,780.30
7,573,259.47
Mebibytes per second
5,041.78
7,395.76
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
1.07
0.29
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
Memory Write
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Operations per second
5,347,459.67
7,520,809.77
Mebibytes per second
5,222.13
7,344.54
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.26
0.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
File I/O
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Reads per Second
2,518.00
4,743.82
Writes per Second
1,678.67
3,162.54
Fsyncs per Second
5,375.23
10,128.84
Read Mebibytes per Second
39.34
74.12
Written Mebibytes per Second
26.23
49.41
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.1
0.05
Maximum Latency (ms)
14.25
2.43
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.35
0.16
Mutex
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms)
1,639.75
1,135.02
Average Latency (ms)
1,650.21
1,145.46
Maximum Latency (ms)
1,660.37
1,150.95
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1,648.20
1,149.76
MySQL
MySQL Read-only
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
9,017.00
10,014.00
Queries per second
90,170.00
100,140.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.02
0.91
Average Latency (ms)
1.11
1
Maximum Latency (ms)
5.75
2.96
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.27
1.14
MySQL Write-only
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
8,101.00
11,181.00
Queries per second
81,010.00
111,810.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.87
0.58
Average Latency (ms)
1.23
0.89
Maximum Latency (ms)
11.04
7.24
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.64
1.16
MySQL Read/Write
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
3,971.00
4,056.00
Queries per second
39,710.00
40,560.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.98
1.7
Average Latency (ms)
2.52
2.46
Maximum Latency (ms)
17.34
19.4
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
3.07
3.82
MySQL INSERT
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
12,157.00
20,663.00
Queries per second
121,570.00
206,630.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.58
0.32
Average Latency (ms)
0.82
0.48
Maximum Latency (ms)
13.14
5.62
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.12
0.64
MySQL Bulk INSERT
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
1,346,717.00
1,870,967.00
Queries per second
13,467,170.00
18,709,670.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.01
0.01
Maximum Latency (ms)
454.87
227.33
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
MySQL SELECT
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
211,595.00
229,513.00
Queries per second
2,115,950.00
2,295,130.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.04
Average Latency (ms)
0.05
0.04
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.28
1.03
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.06
0.05
MySQL SELECT (Random Points)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
6,687.00
7,697.00
Queries per second
66,870.00
76,970.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.46
0.42
Average Latency (ms)
1.49
1.3
Maximum Latency (ms)
5
4.34
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.93
1.67
MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
7,633.00
10,600.00
Queries per second
76,330.00
106,000.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.46
0.37
Average Latency (ms)
1.31
0.94
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.52
2.67
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.73
1.25
MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
12,921.00
19,067.00
Queries per second
129,210.00
190,670.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.6
0.32
Average Latency (ms)
0.77
0.52
Maximum Latency (ms)
10.21
3.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.99
0.73
MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
11,621.00
20,161.00
Queries per second
116,210.00
201,610.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.59
0.32
Average Latency (ms)
0.86
0.5
Maximum Latency (ms)
70.33
11.21
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.3
0.67
MySQL DELETE
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
Transactions per second
137,539.00
155,087.00
Queries per second
1,375,390.00
1,550,870.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.04
Average Latency (ms)
0.07
0.06
Maximum Latency (ms)
5.83
3.89
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.1
0.09
Redis
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second
85,324.23
57,937.43
PING_MBULK per Second
72,150.07
57,670.13
SET per Second
83,682.01
60,096.15
GET per Second
86,430.43
60,938.45
INCR per Second
85,984.52
58,105.75
LPUSH per Second
85,324.23
59,453.03
RPUSH per Second
85,543.20
60,827.25
LPOP per Second
85,034.02
60,864.27
RPOP per Second
84,961.77
61,312.08
SADD per Second
85,763.29
59,066.75
HSET per Second
84,961.77
59,066.75
SPOP per Second
85,984.52
59,276.82
ZADD per Second
85,106.38
58,105.75
ZPOPMIN per Second
86,580.09
59,594.76
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second
44,782.80
38,986.36
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second
21,213.41
22,753.13
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second
14,192.45
15,583.61
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second
11,773.02
14,130.28
MSET (10 keys) per Second
72,046.11
54,674.69
Redis Average Latency (ms)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Frequency Intel (2 GB)
PING_INLINE
0.37
0.52
PING_MBULK
0.43
0.51
SET
0.39
0.51
GET
0.37
0.49
INCR
0.37
0.51
LPUSH
0.38
0.51
RPUSH
0.38
0.50
LPOP
0.38
0.51
RPOP
0.38
0.50
SADD
0.37
0.51
HSET
0.38
0.51
SPOP
0.37
0.50
ZADD
0.38
0.52
ZPOPMIN
0.37
0.50
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)
0.80
0.81
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)
1.61
1.44
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)
2.49
2.06
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)
2.96
2.35
MSET (10 keys)
0.57
0.59
Conclusion
From the friendly robots:
The Vultr High Frequency Intel (2 GB) instance decisively outperforms the Linode Nanode (1 GB) in most benchmarks, especially in Redis operations where it achieves higher request per second rates and lower latencies. For instance, in LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements), Vultr handles 15583 requests per second compared to Linode's 14192, with significantly lower latency. While Linode excels in CPU fairness and file I/O operations, Vultr's stronger memory and database performance make it the better choice for workloads that prioritize high throughput and low latency, such as OLTP operations and bulk data processing.
From the friendly human:
If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for Linode and Vultr.