Linode Nanode (1 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (1 GB)

vs.

My friend, I'm so glad you're here! Today I spun up fresh instances from Linode and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. All instances were spun up with Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Let's get into the numbers.

Overview

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Last Benchmarked Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:01:32 GMT Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:10:32 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 7.0.0-22-generic 7.0.0-28-generic
MySQL Version 8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1 8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
Redis Version 8.0.5 8.0.5
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $5.00 $6.00
RAM (GB) 1 1
CPU Cores 1 1
Storage (TB) 25 25
Storage Type SSD NVMe
Transfer (TB) 1 2

Head-to-head

Category winners from the latest benchmarks.

CategoryWinner
CPU (events/sec)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Memory (read MiB/s)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Disk I/O (MiB/s)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
MySQL (read/write tps)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Redis (GET/sec)Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Value (CPU events per $/mo)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB) takes 5 of 6 categories.

CPU

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Vendor AuthenticAMD AuthenticAMD
Model Name AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,300.00 2,899.99
CPU Cache Size (KB) 512.00 1,024.00
BogoMips 4,600.00 5,799.98
Events per Second 1,479.09 4,233.82
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.65 0.22
Average Latency (ms) 0.68 0.24
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.07 3.63
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.69 0.25

Memory

Memory Read

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Operations per second 5,162,780.30 7,457,681.72
Mebibytes per second 5,041.78 7,282.89
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 1.07 0.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Operations per second 5,347,459.67 7,424,120.81
Mebibytes per second 5,222.13 7,250.12
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 0.26 0.89
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Reads per Second 2,518.00 4,024.70
Writes per Second 1,678.67 2,683.07
Fsyncs per Second 5,375.23 8,597.97
Read Mebibytes per Second 39.34 62.89
Written Mebibytes per Second 26.23 41.92
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.1 0.07
Maximum Latency (ms) 14.25 4.03
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.35 0.19

Mutex

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 1,639.75 1,234.88
Average Latency (ms) 1,650.21 1,242.52
Maximum Latency (ms) 1,660.37 1,247.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1,648.20 1,258.08

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 9,017.00 13,940.00
Queries per second 90,170.00 139,400.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.02 0.66
Average Latency (ms) 1.11 0.72
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.75 9.38
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.27 0.84

MySQL Write-only

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 8,101.00 12,785.00
Queries per second 81,010.00 127,850.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.87 0.61
Average Latency (ms) 1.23 0.78
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.04 7.66
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.64 0.94

MySQL Read/Write

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 3,971.00 6,195.00
Queries per second 39,710.00 61,950.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.98 1.37
Average Latency (ms) 2.52 1.61
Maximum Latency (ms) 17.34 7.73
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.07 1.96

MySQL INSERT

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 12,157.00 19,096.00
Queries per second 121,570.00 190,960.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.58 0.41
Average Latency (ms) 0.82 0.52
Maximum Latency (ms) 13.14 5.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.12 0.61

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 1,346,717.00 2,366,092.00
Queries per second 13,467,170.00 23,660,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 454.87 308.75
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 211,595.00 387,291.00
Queries per second 2,115,950.00 3,872,910.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.05 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.28 1.46
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.06 0.04

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 6,687.00 11,571.00
Queries per second 66,870.00 115,710.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.29
Average Latency (ms) 1.49 0.86
Maximum Latency (ms) 5 3.29
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.93 1.1

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 7,633.00 14,459.00
Queries per second 76,330.00 144,590.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.46 0.22
Average Latency (ms) 1.31 0.69
Maximum Latency (ms) 3.52 2.7
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.73 0.89

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 12,921.00 19,878.00
Queries per second 129,210.00 198,780.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.6 0.4
Average Latency (ms) 0.77 0.5
Maximum Latency (ms) 10.21 10.92
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.99 0.61

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 11,621.00 19,848.00
Queries per second 116,210.00 198,480.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.59 0.41
Average Latency (ms) 0.86 0.5
Maximum Latency (ms) 70.33 3.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.3 0.59

MySQL DELETE

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 137,539.00 269,641.00
Queries per second 1,375,390.00 2,696,410.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.07 0.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.83 1.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.1 0.06

Redis

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 85,324.23 48,262.55
PING_MBULK per Second 72,150.07 48,590.86
SET per Second 83,682.01 48,309.18
GET per Second 86,430.43 48,146.37
INCR per Second 85,984.52 47,687.18
LPUSH per Second 85,324.23 49,164.21
RPUSH per Second 85,543.20 48,379.30
LPOP per Second 85,034.02 49,407.12
RPOP per Second 84,961.77 49,627.79
SADD per Second 85,763.29 48,520.13
HSET per Second 84,961.77 48,239.27
SPOP per Second 85,984.52 48,169.56
ZADD per Second 85,106.38 48,875.86
ZPOPMIN per Second 86,580.09 49,115.91
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 44,782.80 37,993.92
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 21,213.41 24,746.35
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 14,192.45 18,086.45
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 11,773.02 16,278.69
MSET (10 keys) per Second 72,046.11 48,947.62

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Linode – Nanode (1 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
PING_INLINE0.370.65
PING_MBULK0.430.63
SET0.390.65
GET0.370.65
INCR0.370.66
LPUSH0.380.64
RPUSH0.380.65
LPOP0.380.64
RPOP0.380.64
SADD0.370.65
HSET0.380.66
SPOP0.370.64
ZADD0.380.65
ZPOPMIN0.370.64
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.800.83
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.611.31
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.491.68
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.961.91
MSET (10 keys)0.570.69

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

The Vultr High Performance AMD instance outperforms the Linode Nanode in most benchmarks, particularly in CPU performance where it shows higher events per second (4234 vs 1479) and faster Redis operations like SET and GET with respective rates of 48309 vs 83682 RPS and 48146 vs 86430 RPS. For applications that benefit from higher CPU throughput and low latency, such as real-time data processing or high-frequency trading systems, the Vultr instance would be more suitable. However, if you need a more budget-friendly option with acceptable performance for less demanding tasks, the Linode Nanode might still fit the bill.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for Linode and Vultr.

You can also support me next time you shop on Amazon.

Providers & pricing

Related comparisons