Linode Nanode (1 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (1 GB)
My friend, I'm so glad you're here! Today I spun up fresh instances from Linode and Vultr and ran my world famous suite of benchmarking scripts. All instances were spun up with Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 and were created in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Let's get into the numbers.
Overview
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Last Benchmarked
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:01:32 GMT
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 05:10:32 GMT
Linux Distro
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version
7.0.0-22-generic
7.0.0-28-generic
MySQL Version
8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
8.4.10-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
Redis Version
8.0.5
8.0.5
Location
Newark, NJ
Newark, NJ
Monthly Price
$5.00
$6.00
RAM (GB)
1
1
CPU Cores
1
1
Storage (TB)
25
25
Storage Type
SSD
NVMe
Transfer (TB)
1
2
Head-to-head
Category winners from the latest benchmarks.
Category
Winner
CPU (events/sec)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Memory (read MiB/s)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Disk I/O (MiB/s)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
MySQL (read/write tps)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Redis (GET/sec)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Value (CPU events per $/mo)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB) takes 5 of 6 categories.
CPU
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Vendor
AuthenticAMD
AuthenticAMD
Model Name
AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor
AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
Clock Speed (MHz)
2,300.00
2,899.99
CPU Cache Size (KB)
512.00
1,024.00
BogoMips
4,600.00
5,799.98
Events per Second
1,479.09
4,233.82
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.65
0.22
Average Latency (ms)
0.68
0.24
Maximum Latency (ms)
4.07
3.63
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.69
0.25
Memory
Memory Read
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Operations per second
5,162,780.30
7,457,681.72
Mebibytes per second
5,041.78
7,282.89
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
1.07
0.25
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
Memory Write
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Operations per second
5,347,459.67
7,424,120.81
Mebibytes per second
5,222.13
7,250.12
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
0.26
0.89
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
File I/O
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Reads per Second
2,518.00
4,024.70
Writes per Second
1,678.67
2,683.07
Fsyncs per Second
5,375.23
8,597.97
Read Mebibytes per Second
39.34
62.89
Written Mebibytes per Second
26.23
41.92
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.1
0.07
Maximum Latency (ms)
14.25
4.03
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.35
0.19
Mutex
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms)
1,639.75
1,234.88
Average Latency (ms)
1,650.21
1,242.52
Maximum Latency (ms)
1,660.37
1,247.16
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1,648.20
1,258.08
MySQL
MySQL Read-only
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
9,017.00
13,940.00
Queries per second
90,170.00
139,400.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.02
0.66
Average Latency (ms)
1.11
0.72
Maximum Latency (ms)
5.75
9.38
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.27
0.84
MySQL Write-only
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
8,101.00
12,785.00
Queries per second
81,010.00
127,850.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.87
0.61
Average Latency (ms)
1.23
0.78
Maximum Latency (ms)
11.04
7.66
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.64
0.94
MySQL Read/Write
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
3,971.00
6,195.00
Queries per second
39,710.00
61,950.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
1.98
1.37
Average Latency (ms)
2.52
1.61
Maximum Latency (ms)
17.34
7.73
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
3.07
1.96
MySQL INSERT
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
12,157.00
19,096.00
Queries per second
121,570.00
190,960.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.58
0.41
Average Latency (ms)
0.82
0.52
Maximum Latency (ms)
13.14
5.83
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.12
0.61
MySQL Bulk INSERT
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
1,346,717.00
2,366,092.00
Queries per second
13,467,170.00
23,660,920.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0
0
Average Latency (ms)
0.01
0
Maximum Latency (ms)
454.87
308.75
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0
0
MySQL SELECT
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
211,595.00
387,291.00
Queries per second
2,115,950.00
3,872,910.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.02
Average Latency (ms)
0.05
0.03
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.28
1.46
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.06
0.04
MySQL SELECT (Random Points)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
6,687.00
11,571.00
Queries per second
66,870.00
115,710.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.46
0.29
Average Latency (ms)
1.49
0.86
Maximum Latency (ms)
5
3.29
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.93
1.1
MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
7,633.00
14,459.00
Queries per second
76,330.00
144,590.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.46
0.22
Average Latency (ms)
1.31
0.69
Maximum Latency (ms)
3.52
2.7
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.73
0.89
MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
12,921.00
19,878.00
Queries per second
129,210.00
198,780.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.6
0.4
Average Latency (ms)
0.77
0.5
Maximum Latency (ms)
10.21
10.92
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.99
0.61
MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
11,621.00
19,848.00
Queries per second
116,210.00
198,480.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.59
0.41
Average Latency (ms)
0.86
0.5
Maximum Latency (ms)
70.33
3.22
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
1.3
0.59
MySQL DELETE
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second
137,539.00
269,641.00
Queries per second
1,375,390.00
2,696,410.00
Minimum Latency (ms)
0.04
0.02
Average Latency (ms)
0.07
0.04
Maximum Latency (ms)
5.83
1.94
95th Percentile Latency (ms)
0.1
0.06
Redis
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second
85,324.23
48,262.55
PING_MBULK per Second
72,150.07
48,590.86
SET per Second
83,682.01
48,309.18
GET per Second
86,430.43
48,146.37
INCR per Second
85,984.52
47,687.18
LPUSH per Second
85,324.23
49,164.21
RPUSH per Second
85,543.20
48,379.30
LPOP per Second
85,034.02
49,407.12
RPOP per Second
84,961.77
49,627.79
SADD per Second
85,763.29
48,520.13
HSET per Second
84,961.77
48,239.27
SPOP per Second
85,984.52
48,169.56
ZADD per Second
85,106.38
48,875.86
ZPOPMIN per Second
86,580.09
49,115.91
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second
44,782.80
37,993.92
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second
21,213.41
24,746.35
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second
14,192.45
18,086.45
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second
11,773.02
16,278.69
MSET (10 keys) per Second
72,046.11
48,947.62
Redis Average Latency (ms)
Linode – Nanode (1 GB)
Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
PING_INLINE
0.37
0.65
PING_MBULK
0.43
0.63
SET
0.39
0.65
GET
0.37
0.65
INCR
0.37
0.66
LPUSH
0.38
0.64
RPUSH
0.38
0.65
LPOP
0.38
0.64
RPOP
0.38
0.64
SADD
0.37
0.65
HSET
0.38
0.66
SPOP
0.37
0.64
ZADD
0.38
0.65
ZPOPMIN
0.37
0.64
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)
0.80
0.83
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)
1.61
1.31
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)
2.49
1.68
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)
2.96
1.91
MSET (10 keys)
0.57
0.69
Conclusion
From the friendly robots:
The Vultr High Performance AMD instance outperforms the Linode Nanode in most benchmarks, particularly in CPU performance where it shows higher events per second (4234 vs 1479) and faster Redis operations like SET and GET with respective rates of 48309 vs 83682 RPS and 48146 vs 86430 RPS. For applications that benefit from higher CPU throughput and low latency, such as real-time data processing or high-frequency trading systems, the Vultr instance would be more suitable. However, if you need a more budget-friendly option with acceptable performance for less demanding tasks, the Linode Nanode might still fit the bill.
From the friendly human:
If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for Linode and Vultr.