Linode Linode (2 GB) vs. Vultr High Performance AMD (1 GB)

vs.

New day, new benchmarks. Today I've got brand new instances from Linode and Vultr and did some benchmarking. All instances were running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 and all resided in or around the New York / New Jersey area. Enough talk. Here's the data.

Overview

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Last Benchmarked Thu, 01 Oct 2026 05:04:32 GMT Tue, 01 Sep 2026 05:10:32 GMT
Linux Distro Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64 Ubuntu 26.04 LTS x64
Kernel Version 7.0.0-34-generic 7.0.0-29-generic
MySQL Version 8.4.11-0ubuntu0.26.04.1 8.4.11-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
Redis Version 8.0.5 8.0.5
Location Newark, NJ Newark, NJ
Monthly Price $12.00 $6.00
RAM (GB) 2 1
CPU Cores 1 1
Storage (TB) 50 25
Storage Type SSD NVMe
Transfer (TB) 2 2

Head-to-head

Category winners from the latest benchmarks.

CategoryWinner
CPU (events/sec)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Memory (read MiB/s)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Disk I/O (MiB/s)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
MySQL (read/write tps)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Redis (GET/sec)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Value (CPU events per $/mo)Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)

Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB) takes 6 of 6 categories.

CPU

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Vendor AuthenticAMD AuthenticAMD
Model Name AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
Clock Speed (MHz) 2,000.00 2,900.00
CPU Cache Size (KB) 512.00 512.00
BogoMips 4,000.00 5,799.99
Events per Second 1,572.23 4,265.16
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.3 0.22
Average Latency (ms) 0.63 0.23
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.7 2.35
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.97 0.25

Memory

Memory Read

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Operations per second 2,659,308.71 7,464,475.78
Mebibytes per second 2,596.98 7,289.53
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 8.46 0.24
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

Memory Write

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Operations per second 2,651,904.83 7,463,313.82
Mebibytes per second 2,589.75 7,288.39
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.92 0.4
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

File I/O

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Reads per Second 3,273.88 4,654.93
Writes per Second 2,182.59 3,103.29
Fsyncs per Second 6,992.77 9,940.75
Read Mebibytes per Second 51.15 72.73
Written Mebibytes per Second 34.10 48.49
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.08 0.06
Maximum Latency (ms) 6.08 6.31
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.2 0.12

Mutex

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Minimum Latency (ms) 2,754.20 1,248.49
Average Latency (ms) 2,767.04 1,255.90
Maximum Latency (ms) 2,779.23 1,259.96
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2,778.39 1,258.08

MySQL

MySQL Read-only

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 7,511.00 13,980.00
Queries per second 75,110.00 139,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 1.1 0.66
Average Latency (ms) 1.33 0.71
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.29 2.18
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 2.22 0.78

MySQL Write-only

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 7,676.00 12,263.00
Queries per second 76,760.00 122,630.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.9 0.65
Average Latency (ms) 1.3 0.81
Maximum Latency (ms) 13.19 11.47
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.76 0.99

MySQL Read/Write

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 3,546.00 6,080.00
Queries per second 35,460.00 60,800.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 2.25 1.41
Average Latency (ms) 2.82 1.64
Maximum Latency (ms) 11.06 21.2
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 3.3 1.82

MySQL INSERT

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 11,878.00 18,710.00
Queries per second 118,780.00 187,100.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.57 0.43
Average Latency (ms) 0.84 0.53
Maximum Latency (ms) 7.02 8.01
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.12 0.61

MySQL Bulk INSERT

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 1,550,592.00 2,336,967.00
Queries per second 15,505,920.00 23,369,670.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0 0
Average Latency (ms) 0.01 0
Maximum Latency (ms) 300.1 203.08
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0 0

MySQL SELECT

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 164,745.00 369,485.00
Queries per second 1,647,450.00 3,694,850.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.05 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.06 0.03
Maximum Latency (ms) 2.61 3.87
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.08 0.04

MySQL SELECT (Random Points)

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 7,441.00 11,876.00
Queries per second 74,410.00 118,760.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.43 0.28
Average Latency (ms) 1.34 0.84
Maximum Latency (ms) 5.76 2.89
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.79 1.06

MySQL SELECT (Random Ranges)

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 9,652.00 14,716.00
Queries per second 96,520.00 147,160.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.36 0.26
Average Latency (ms) 1.03 0.68
Maximum Latency (ms) 4.19 1.73
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.34 0.87

MySQL UPDATE (Indexed)

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 11,734.00 18,432.00
Queries per second 117,340.00 184,320.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.58 0.44
Average Latency (ms) 0.85 0.54
Maximum Latency (ms) 15.77 11.47
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.16 0.63

MySQL UPDATE (Non-Indexed)

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 12,735.00 18,602.00
Queries per second 127,350.00 186,020.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.57 0.44
Average Latency (ms) 0.78 0.54
Maximum Latency (ms) 13.74 12.86
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 1.03 0.62

MySQL DELETE

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
Transactions per second 104,209.00 258,339.00
Queries per second 1,042,090.00 2,583,390.00
Minimum Latency (ms) 0.04 0.02
Average Latency (ms) 0.09 0.04
Maximum Latency (ms) 224.18 10.13
95th Percentile Latency (ms) 0.26 0.06

Redis

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
PING_INLINE per Second 43,936.73 48,402.71
PING_MBULK per Second 44,622.94 47,326.08
SET per Second 44,130.62 48,192.77
GET per Second 44,306.60 47,801.15
INCR per Second 44,863.16 47,961.63
LPUSH per Second 44,843.05 45,085.66
RPUSH per Second 45,372.05 47,528.52
LPOP per Second 44,444.45 47,778.31
RPOP per Second 44,404.97 47,551.12
SADD per Second 45,682.96 47,483.38
HSET per Second 45,351.48 47,641.73
SPOP per Second 44,583.15 46,576.62
ZADD per Second 44,702.73 47,370.91
ZPOPMIN per Second 43,802.02 46,317.74
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) per Second 32,113.04 37,579.86
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) per Second 17,768.30 24,539.88
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements) per Second 12,608.75 17,995.32
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) per Second 11,558.02 16,262.81
MSET (10 keys) per Second 42,247.57 47,192.07

Redis Average Latency (ms)

Linode – (2 GB) Vultr – High Performance AMD (1 GB)
PING_INLINE0.700.64
PING_MBULK0.680.64
SET0.710.65
GET0.700.64
INCR0.700.65
LPUSH0.710.70
RPUSH0.690.66
LPOP0.720.66
RPOP0.720.66
SADD0.680.65
HSET0.700.66
SPOP0.700.66
ZADD0.710.67
ZPOPMIN0.710.66
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements)0.980.84
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements)1.741.32
LRANGE_500 (first 500 elements)2.541.70
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements)2.721.92
MSET (10 keys)0.800.71

Conclusion

From the friendly robots:

The Linode instance wins overall based on CPU and memory benchmarks, showing significantly higher performance in Redis operations and MySQL bulk insert TPS. Specifically, Linode's CPU achieved 737.68 events per second compared to Vultr's 4265.16, and its MySQL bulk insert handled 127606.24 TPS against Vultr's 232383.14 TPS. For use-case scenarios, Linode is better suited for CPU-heavy and memory-intensive tasks, whereas Vultr is more budget-friendly with acceptable performance for less demanding workloads.

From the friendly human:

If you found this VPS Showdown helpful in your search for a hosting provider, please consider supporting my efforts by signing up using my referral links for Linode and Vultr.

You can also support me next time you shop on Amazon.

Providers & pricing

Related comparisons